Karnataka High Court
Criminal Procedure and EvidenceAlternative Dispute Resolution

Criminal petitions dismissed as withdrawn following settlement before the Commercial Court.

INDIAN KHADI EXPORT DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION (R) vs MR.MADDISETTY VENUGOPAL RAO

Karnataka High CourtJUDGMENT: September 24, 20261 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Criminal petitions dismissed as withdrawn following settlement before the Commercial Court.. INDIAN KHADI EXPORT DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION (R) vs MR.MADDISETTY VENUGOPAL RAO. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The petitioner, Indian Khadi Export Development Association (R), filed six criminal petitions under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 / Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash proceedings arising from complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, pending before the XXIII Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bengaluru.

Source reference: paras. 1–2; pp. 6–8

The petitioner subsequently filed a memo stating that the dispute had been settled before the Commercial Court through mediation in O.S. No. 1378/2025 and sought withdrawal of the petitions.

Source reference: para. 2; p. 8
02

Issues

Whether the criminal petitions seeking to quash the pending proceedings should be dismissed as withdrawn following the petitioner’s memo reporting settlement.

Source reference: paras. 1–3; pp. 6–8
03

Law Applied

The petitions invoked the High Court’s inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. / Section 528 BNSS to seek quashing of criminal proceedings.

Source reference: paras. 1–2; pp. 6–8

The Court did not state or apply any substantive rule concerning the merits of the Section 138 proceedings; it acted on the petitioner’s request to withdraw after settlement.

Source reference: paras. 2–3; p. 8
04

Reasoning

The petitioner informed the Court that the parties had settled the dispute through mediation before the Commercial Court and expressly requested withdrawal of the connected petitions.

Source reference: para. 2; p. 8

Accepting the memo and counsel’s submission, the Court disposed of the matters without examining the grounds for quashing or deciding the merits of the underlying complaints.

Source reference: para. 3; p. 8
05

Holding

The Court accepted the withdrawal memo and dismissed all six criminal petitions as withdrawn.

The order does not determine the merits of the quashing requests or the underlying proceedings.

Source reference: para. 3; p. 8
06

Acts & Sections Cited

3 provisions across 3 statutes referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Code of Criminal Procedure, 19731

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 20231

Negotiable Instruments Act, 18811

Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

INDIAN KHADI EXPORT DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION (R)vsMR.MADDISETTY VENUGOPAL RAO

Karnataka High Court · September 24, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment