Delhi High CourtCriminal LawCriminal Procedure and Evidence

Delhi HC Grants Bail To Man Accused Of Stabbing Mother-In-Law After Over Four Years In Custody, Citing Simple Neck Injuries

Maheshv.State (Govt Of Nct Of Delhi)

Delhi HC Grants Bail To Man Accused Of Stabbing Mother-In-Law After Over Four Years In Custody, Citing Simple Neck Injuries. Mahesh vs State (Govt Of Nct Of Delhi). Delhi High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

1. Whether the applicant should be granted regular bail while facing trial for an offence under Section 307 IPC

The court held

The Court allowed the bail application and directed the applicant’s release on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹10,000 with one surety in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Trial Court or Duty Magistrate.

It also directed

It directed that a copy of the order be sent to the concerned Jail Superintendent and disposed of the pending application.

01Facts

The applicant sought regular bail in FIR No. 522/2022, registered at Police Station Kotwali for an offence under Section 307 IPC.

p. 1

The prosecution alleged that the applicant stabbed the complainant de facto, his mother-in-law, in the neck.

pp. 1–3

The initial police information, however, reported that she had been shot by an unknown person.

pp. 1–3

The complainant and her family members had been examined at trial; the applicant had been in custody for more than four years.

pp. 1–3

The MLC recorded two lacerated neck wounds, assessed as simple, and the complainant was discharged the same day.

pp. 1–3

02Issues

i.1. Whether the applicant should be granted regular bail while facing trial for an offence under Section 307 IPC

p. 1 · p. 3

ii.2. Whether the circumstances—including the nature of the injuries, the applicant’s period in custody, and the status of witness examination—justified further detention

p. 3

03Law Applied

The application concerned regular bail in a prosecution under Section 307 IPC.

p. 1

The Court assessed the request by considering the circumstances relevant to continued pre-trial detention, including the nature of the injuries, the period spent in custody, and the stage of the trial.

p. 3

No precedent or more specific bail doctrine was cited in the judgment.

Provisions in the judgment · 1 · Linked ones open on LawLens

Indian Penal Code, 1860 Section 307

04Reasoning

The Court noted that the first information described a gunshot injury caused by an unknown person, while the subsequent account alleged stabbing by the applicant; the prosecution’s explanation that the informant was illiterate did not satisfactorily resolve this discrepancy, although the trial court was to assess the evidence independently.

p. 3

The Court also considered that the MLC classified the injuries as simple, the complainant had been discharged on the same day, the applicant had been in custody for more than four years, and the complainant and her family members had already been examined.

p. 3

In light of those circumstances, it found no basis to continue depriving the applicant of his liberty.

p. 3

05Holding

The Court allowed the bail application and directed the applicant’s release on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹10,000 with one surety in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Trial Court or Duty Magistrate.

p. 3

It directed that a copy of the order be sent to the concerned Jail Superintendent and disposed of the pending application.

p. 4
Delhi High Court

Original Court PDF

MaheshvsState (Govt Of Nct Of Delhi)

Delhi High Court · October 29, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment