Punjab and Haryana High CourtCriminal LawCriminal Procedure and Evidence

Exactly 1 Kg Charas Is Not Commercial Quantity: P&H HC Cuts Convict’s 10-Year Term To Time Served After 25 Years

Shiv Kumarv.Stat Of Haryana

Exactly 1 Kg Charas Is Not Commercial Quantity: P&H HC Cuts Convict’s 10-Year Term To Time Served After 25 Years. Shiv Kumar vs Stat Of Haryana. Punjab and Haryana High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

1. Whether 1 kg of charas, being exactly the quantity specified for charas as commercial quantity, constituted “commercial quantity” under the NDPS Act.

The court held

The conviction under Section 20 of the NDPS Act was upheld, but the sentence was modified to the period already undergone.

It also directed

The appeal was partly allowed.

Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, were disposed of.

01Facts

The appellant was convicted under Section 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (“NDPS Act”), after 1 kg of charas was recovered from him on 15 April 2001.

¶ 2–5

The trial court sentenced him to ten years’ rigorous imprisonment and a fine of ₹1,00,000, with two years’ rigorous imprisonment in default of payment.

¶ 2–5

In appeal, the appellant did not press a challenge to his conviction and sought reduction of sentence, relying on the time already served, the age of the case, and his lack of subsequent prosecutions.

¶ 9–11

The State opposed sentence reduction.

¶ 12

02Issues

i.1. Whether 1 kg of charas, being exactly the quantity specified for charas as commercial quantity, constituted “commercial quantity” under the NDPS Act.

¶ 15–16

ii.2. Whether the appellant’s sentence should be reduced to the period already undergone, having regard to the circumstances identified by the Court.

¶ 17–20

03Law Applied

Section 2(viia) of the NDPS Act defines “commercial quantity” as a quantity greater than the quantity specified by the Central Government by notification.

¶ 16

The applicable notification specified 1 kg as the commercial quantity for charas; accordingly, a quantity exactly equal to 1 kg does not meet the statutory definition of commercial quantity.

¶ 15–16

The Court also treated the absence of a prescribed minimum sentence for the relevant non-commercial quantity, together with the circumstances of the case, as supporting a reduction of sentence.

¶ 18–20

Provisions in the judgment · 3 · Linked ones open on LawLens

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 20Section 2

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Section 173

04Reasoning

The Court held that the recovered 1 kg of charas was exactly—not greater than—the notified threshold, and therefore was not commercial quantity within Section 2(viia).

¶ 15–16

In considering sentence, it relied on the non-commercial classification, the approximately 25-year interval since the incident, the appellant’s imprisonment of one year, nine months and three days, his status as a first offender, the absence of subsequent prosecutions, and his age of over 49 years.

¶ 17–19

On that cumulative basis, it found the ten-year sentence harsh and the period already served sufficient to meet the ends of justice.

¶ 19–20

05Holding

The conviction under Section 20 of the NDPS Act was upheld, but the sentence was modified to the period already undergone.

¶ 14, 21

The appeal was partly allowed.

¶ 21

Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, were disposed of.

¶ 22
Punjab and Haryana High Court

Original Court PDF

Shiv KumarvsStat Of Haryana

Punjab and Haryana High Court · November 04, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment