Facts
The Union of India challenged the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Vadodara’s order dated 27 December 2018, passed below Exhibit-10 in Land Acquisition Reference No. 2 of 2015.
Source reference: para. 7Notice had been issued in light of a coordinate Bench’s order remanding a matter said to involve an identical issue arising from the same acquisition proceedings.
Source reference: para. 4The respondent organisation stated that it had no objection to remand for recalculation of the amount payable to it.
Source reference: para. 5The parties agreed to that course.
Source reference: para. 6Issues
1. Whether the order below Exhibit-10 should be set aside and the matter remanded to the executing Court for fresh adjudication of the respondent’s claim, including recalculation of the amount payable.
Source reference: paras. 5–72. Whether the executing Court should hear the parties and consider fresh calculations before deciding the claim.
Source reference: paras. 7–8Law Applied
The judgment identifies no statutory provision or substantive legal test.
Source reference: no citationIt relies on a coordinate Bench’s order in Civil Revision Application No. 42 of 2013 concerning a similar issue and on the parties’ agreement to remand.
Source reference: paras. 4–6The operative approach was to return the application for fresh adjudication, afford the parties a reasonable opportunity to be heard, and permit them to submit fresh calculations.
Source reference: paras. 7–8Reasoning
The Court considered the prior remand in the similar matter and the respondent’s express lack of objection to remand for recalculation.
Source reference: paras. 4–6Given the parties’ consensus, it accepted remand rather than determine the amount payable in the revision.
Source reference: paras. 4–6It directed the executing Court to rehear the application, consider any fresh calculations filed by the parties, and decide the respondent’s claim afresh.
Source reference: paras. 7–8Holding
The revision application was partly allowed.
The order dated 27 December 2018 below Exhibit-10 was quashed and set aside, and the matter was remanded to the executing Court for fresh adjudication after giving the parties a reasonable opportunity to be heard and permitting fresh calculations.
Source reference: paras. 7–9The executing Court was requested to decide the claim as early as possible, preferably within two months of receiving the order.
Source reference: para. 8The pending civil application was disposed of, and the interim relief was vacated.
Source reference: para. 9Original Court PDF
UNION OF INDIA THRU DEFENCE ESTATE OFFICERvsVADODARA PANJRAPOL ORGANISATION THRU PRESIDENT DIPAKBHAI J SHAH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
