01Facts
On 9 April 2022, a Transport Corporation bus collided with a scooter ridden by Sakthivel. Sakthivel sustained serious injuries and died on 15 April 2022; his wife, two children and parents sought compensation.
pp. 3–7 · ¶ 3–4, 8–12The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal found the bus driver solely negligent and awarded the claimants ₹40,64,963.
pp. 3–7 · ¶ 3–4, 8–12In calculating loss of dependency, it relied on employment documents showing monthly earnings of 1,112 UAE dirhams, converted at ₹20.14 per dirham, added 25% for future prospects, applied a multiplier of 15 and deducted one-fourth for personal expenses.
pp. 3–7 · ¶ 3–4, 8–12The Corporation appealed, including on the ground that the income documents were from 2021 and not the year of the accident.
pp. 3–7 · ¶ 3–4, 8–1202Issues
i.1. Whether the Tribunal’s assessment of Sakthivel’s income and resulting loss-of-dependency award was supported by the evidence and applicable principles
pp. 5–6 · ¶ 9–11ii.2. Whether the Tribunal’s overall award, including conventional damages, warranted appellate interference
pp. 6–7 · ¶ 12–1403Law Applied
Under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, an aggrieved party may appeal against a motor accident claims award.
p. 2The Court applied Sarla Verma v. Delhi Transport Corporation, (2009) 6 SCC 121, for the multiplier and deduction towards personal expenses in calculating loss of dependency, and National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Pranay Sethi, 2018 (1) LW 331, in relation to future prospects and conventional heads of compensation.
pp. 5–7 · ¶ 9, 12The Court assessed income by reference to the documentary evidence of the deceased’s earnings and the applicable currency conversion rate.
p. 5 · ¶ 8–9Provisions in the judgment · 1 · Linked ones open on LawLens
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173
04Reasoning
The deceased’s passport established that he was 40 years old at the time of the accident, and Exs. P24 and P25 evidenced earnings of 1,112 UAE dirhams.
pp. 5–7 · ¶ 8–12Applying the stated conversion rate, the Tribunal arrived at monthly income of ₹22,396, added 25% for future prospects, and applied a multiplier of 15 and a one-fourth deduction for personal expenses, producing loss of dependency of ₹37,79,325.
pp. 5–7 · ¶ 8–12The Court rejected the Corporation’s objection that the income documents were outdated: both certificates pre-dated the accident and death, and therefore could properly be considered.
pp. 5–7 · ¶ 8–12It also found no error in the Tribunal’s assessment of the other compensation heads.
pp. 5–7 · ¶ 8–1205Holding
The Court dismissed the appeal and affirmed the Tribunal’s award of ₹40,64,963.
pp. 7–8 · ¶ 13–15It directed the Corporation to deposit any balance due, after accounting for amounts already deposited, within twelve weeks of receiving the judgment.
pp. 7–8 · ¶ 13–15The claimants may withdraw their respective shares in accordance with the Tribunal’s award; the minors’ shares are to remain in fixed deposits until they attain majority, with interest withdrawable by their mother once every three months.
pp. 7–8 · ¶ 13–15No costs were awarded, and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed.
pp. 7–8 · ¶ 13–15Original Court PDF
The Managing Director,vsS. Vanitha
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
