Madras High Court
Civil LawTransport, Maritime, and Aviation Law

For a 2023 accident, a mason’s notional monthly income is fixed at ₹20,000.

Dhanalakshmi vs Sumathi

Madras High CourtJUDGMENT: September 23, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
For a 2023 accident, a mason’s notional monthly income is fixed at ₹20,000.. Dhanalakshmi vs Sumathi. Madras High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

Gurusamy died after a KPN bus struck him while he was standing at a bus stop on 14 July 2023.

Source reference: pp. 2–6

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal found the bus driver negligent and awarded ₹15,15,800, including ₹13,06,800 for loss of dependency, based on a notional monthly income of ₹12,000.

Source reference: pp. 2–6

His dependants appealed, contending that the income was too low because he worked as a mason and seeking enhancement.

Source reference: pp. 2–6

The insurer opposed the appeal, arguing that the income was properly assessed in the absence of proof.

Source reference: pp. 2–6
02

Issues

Whether the Tribunal’s assessment of Gurusamy’s notional monthly income at ₹12,000 should be enhanced, having regard to his work as a mason and the absence of documentary proof of earnings.

Source reference: pp. 6–7

Whether the compensation awarded by the Tribunal should be modified accordingly.

Source reference: pp. 7–8
03

Law Applied

Under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, an aggrieved claimant may appeal against an award of the Claims Tribunal.

Source reference: no citation

In assessing compensation for loss of dependency, Sarla Verma v. Delhi Transport Corporation, 2009 (2) TN MAC 1 (SC), governs the applicable multiplier and deduction for personal expenses; National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Pranay Sethi, 2017 (2) TN MAC 609 (SC), governs the addition for future prospects.

Source reference: pp. 5, 7

The Court applied a 10% addition for future prospects, a one-fourth deduction for personal expenses, and a multiplier of 11.

Source reference: pp. 5, 7
04

Reasoning

The Court treated negligence as undisputed and identified the income assessment as the central grievance.

Source reference: pp. 6–7

Although the claimants asserted earnings of ₹40,000 per month, they produced no independent evidence to substantiate that amount.

Source reference: p. 7

Nevertheless, considering the accident occurred in 2023 and that masonry was skilled work, the Court found the Tribunal’s ₹12,000 assessment too low and fixed monthly income at ₹20,000.

Source reference: p. 7

Applying the cited principles, it added 10% for future prospects, deducted one-fourth for personal expenses, and used a multiplier of 11, resulting in loss of dependency of ₹21,78,000.

Source reference: pp. 7–8

It left the Tribunal’s awards under the conventional heads unchanged.

Source reference: p. 8
05

Holding

The appeal was partly allowed.

The total compensation was enhanced from ₹15,15,800 to ₹23,87,000, comprising ₹21,78,000 for loss of dependency and the confirmed amounts for funeral expenses, loss of estate, and loss of consortium.

Source reference: p. 8

The insurer was directed to deposit the enhanced compensation with interest at 7.5% per annum from the claim petition date until deposit, together with applicable costs and subject to credit for amounts already deposited, within eight weeks.

Source reference: pp. 8–9

The Tribunal was directed to calculate and disburse the amount after adjustments; the claimants must pay any court fee due on the enhancement.

Source reference: pp. 8–9
06

Acts & Sections Cited

1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Motor Vehicles Act, 19881

Madras High Court

Original Court PDF

DhanalakshmivsSumathi

Madras High Court · September 23, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment