Facts
The applicant, Nirbhay Sahu, was arrested on 17.03.2026 in connection with Crime No. 30/2025 by P.S. EOW/ACB Raipur
Source reference: para. 1, 3It is alleged that the applicant entered into a criminal conspiracy to misuse his official position to provide illegal compensation to certain individuals (Smt. Uma Tiwari and others) under the "Bharat Mala" project economic corridor
Source reference: para. 2The prosecution alleged that compensation was wrongly disbursed by selling land already acquired back to the government
Source reference: para. 2The applicant filed this first bail application on grounds of parity with seven co-accused persons who had already been granted bail and because the charge-sheet had already been filed
Source reference: para. 3Issues
1. Whether the applicant is entitled to the grant of regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, based on the principle of parity and the stage of the investigation
Source reference: para. 1, 6Law Applied
The court applied Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), which governs the power of the High Court or Court of Session to grant bail
Source reference: para. 1The court also applied the doctrine of parity, which suggests that if co-accused with similar roles are granted bail, the same liberty should be extended to the applicant unless distinct circumstances exist
Source reference: para. 6Procedural conditions for bail were governed by Sections 269, 84, 209, and 351 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) and BNSS regarding court attendance and consequences of default
Source reference: para. 7Reasoning
The Court observed that while the applicant was allegedly involved in the stated crime, his case was identical to that of several co-accused persons, including Smt. Basanti Dhritlahrey, Dinesh Patel, and Kedar Tiwari, all of whom had been granted bail by the High Court between July 2025 and January 2026
Source reference: para. 3, 6The Court noted that the charge-sheet is already filed and the applicant has no previous criminal antecedents
Source reference: para. 6Considering the nature of the offence and the fact that the trial would take a considerable amount of time to conclude, the Court found no reason to treat the applicant differently from the co-accused, thereby justifying bail on the ground of parity
Source reference: para. 6Holding
The Court answered the issue in the affirmative, holding that the applicant is entitled to be released on parity
The High Court allowed the bail application, granting regular bail to Nirbhay Sahu. He was ordered to be released upon furnishing a personal bond with two sureties, subject to conditions including: (i) not seeking adjournments during witness testimony, (ii) appearing on all trial dates as per Section 269 BNS, (iii) appearing for framing of charges and recording of statements under Section 351 BNSS, and (iv) facing proceedings under Section 209 BNS in case of misuse of liberty
Source reference: para. 7Original Court PDF
NIRBHAY SAHUvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in