Facts
The applicants, regularised Safaiwala (Group D) employees in the Commercial and Medical Departments respectively, applied for promotion to Clerk-cum-Typist under a notification dated 7 November 2016.
Source reference: pp. 1–3They were excluded from the eligibility list on the ground that they did not work in administrative offices, although the notification listed Safaiwala as an eligible category.
Source reference: pp. 1–3By interim order, they were permitted to sit the examination provisionally, and their results were placed in sealed cover.
Source reference: p. 3The respondents later stated that both applicants had been promoted as Junior Clerks and had received further promotions in the ordinary course.
Source reference: p. 3Issues
Whether the applicants were eligible to participate in the 7 November 2016 selection despite working in the Commercial and Medical Departments rather than administrative offices.
Source reference: pp. 2–4Whether the applicants’ sealed-cover results should be opened and, if they qualified, consequential notional benefits granted.
Source reference: p. 4Law Applied
The Tribunal applied the terms of the selection notification dated 7 November 2016, which listed “Bhishti/Safaiwala” among the eligible categories and was addressed to all officers of the Lucknow Division.
Source reference: p. 3No statute, regulation, or judicial precedent was cited.
Source reference: no citationThe governing principle was that eligibility must be determined by the notification’s stated categories; an additional administrative-office restriction could not be imposed where the notification did not provide for it.
Source reference: pp. 3–4Reasoning
The notification expressly included Safaiwala among the eligible categories and applied to the Lucknow Division.
Source reference: pp. 3–4The applicants’ departmental postings therefore did not make them ineligible on the stated ground that they were not working in administrative offices.
Source reference: pp. 3–4Since they had participated provisionally and their results were in sealed cover, the Tribunal directed that the results be opened and linked any further relief to whether they had qualified.
Source reference: p. 4Holding
The Tribunal held that the applicants were not ineligible for the selection notified on 7 November 2016.
It directed the respondents to open their sealed-cover results and, if either applicant had qualified, grant that applicant notional benefits at par with other successful candidates within three months of receiving a certified copy of the order.
Source reference: p. 4Pending miscellaneous applications were disposed of, and the parties were directed to bear their own costs.
Source reference: p. 4Original Court PDF
DAYANANDvsUnion Of India
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
![Group D Safaiwalas listed as eligible cannot be excluded from clerical selection based on department.. DAYANAND vs Union Of India. CAT - ['Lucknow']. LawLens](/stories/thumbnails/group-d-safaiwalas-listed-as-eligible-cannot-be-excluded-from-clerical-selection-based-on-e0da6d93a85e4f88b68feb732e723ac5.webp)