Facts
The petitioner challenged an adjudication order dated 11 February 2025 and an appellate order dated 25 March 2026 under Section 107 of the West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
Source reference: para. 2The appellate authority had dismissed the appeal as time-barred.
Source reference: para. 2The petitioner said the show-cause notice dated 14 November 2024 was uploaded only under the GST portal’s “Additional Notice and Orders” tab, without separate intimation, and that he consequently did not respond.
Source reference: para. 3The State opposed the petition, contending that the petitioner had been given ample opportunity to defend himself.
Source reference: para. 4Issues
Whether the petitioner’s appeal was properly dismissed on limitation in the circumstances, where the show-cause notice was uploaded under the “Additional Notice and Orders” tab without separate intimation.
Source reference: para. 3, 5–6Whether the adjudication and appellate orders should be set aside and the matter reconsidered after the petitioner is given an opportunity to respond to the show-cause notice.
Source reference: para. 5–7Law Applied
Section 107 of the West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 governs appeals under those enactments.
Source reference: para. 2The Court applied the principles of natural justice, concluding that, in the circumstances, uploading the show-cause notice only under the specified portal tab without separate intimation deprived the petitioner of an effective opportunity to respond.
Source reference: para. 5No precedent was cited.
Source reference: no citationReasoning
The Court found that the notice had been uploaded only under the “Additional Notice and Orders” tab and that no separate intimation had been given.
Source reference: para. 5It held that this supported a prima facie case of a natural-justice violation and explained the petitioner’s failure to reply.
Source reference: para. 5Since the appeal had been dismissed solely on limitation and the merits had not been considered, the Court found intervention warranted in the interests of justice.
Source reference: para. 6Holding
The Court quashed the appellate order dated 25 March 2026 and the adjudication order dated 11 February 2025.
It directed the petitioner to reply to the show-cause notice within two weeks; the authority must consider the reply and issue a fresh reasoned order after affording a hearing within four weeks of receiving the reply, and communicate its decision within a further week.
Source reference: para. 7The writ petition was disposed of accordingly.
Source reference: para. 8Acts & Sections Cited
2 provisions across 2 statutes referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.
West Bengal Goods And Services Tax Act, 20171
Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 20171
Original Court PDF
SUFAL HALDERvsTHE DEPUTY COMMISSIIONER OF REVENUE, SALT LAKE CHARGE AND ORS
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
