Calcutta High Court
Tax LawAdministrative and Public Law

GST notice uploaded only under “Additional Notices and Orders” without separate intimation violates natural justice.

SUFAL HALDER vs THE DEPUTY COMMISSIIONER OF REVENUE, SALT LAKE CHARGE AND ORS

Calcutta High CourtJUDGMENT: October 12, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
GST notice uploaded only under “Additional Notices and Orders” without separate intimation violates natural justice.. SUFAL HALDER vs THE DEPUTY COMMISSIIONER OF REVENUE, SALT LAKE CHARGE AND ORS. Calcutta High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The petitioner challenged an adjudication order dated 11 February 2025 and an appellate order dated 25 March 2026 under Section 107 of the West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.

Source reference: para. 2

The appellate authority had dismissed the appeal as time-barred.

Source reference: para. 2

The petitioner said the show-cause notice dated 14 November 2024 was uploaded only under the GST portal’s “Additional Notice and Orders” tab, without separate intimation, and that he consequently did not respond.

Source reference: para. 3

The State opposed the petition, contending that the petitioner had been given ample opportunity to defend himself.

Source reference: para. 4
02

Issues

Whether the petitioner’s appeal was properly dismissed on limitation in the circumstances, where the show-cause notice was uploaded under the “Additional Notice and Orders” tab without separate intimation.

Source reference: para. 3, 5–6

Whether the adjudication and appellate orders should be set aside and the matter reconsidered after the petitioner is given an opportunity to respond to the show-cause notice.

Source reference: para. 5–7
03

Law Applied

Section 107 of the West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 governs appeals under those enactments.

Source reference: para. 2

The Court applied the principles of natural justice, concluding that, in the circumstances, uploading the show-cause notice only under the specified portal tab without separate intimation deprived the petitioner of an effective opportunity to respond.

Source reference: para. 5

No precedent was cited.

Source reference: no citation
04

Reasoning

The Court found that the notice had been uploaded only under the “Additional Notice and Orders” tab and that no separate intimation had been given.

Source reference: para. 5

It held that this supported a prima facie case of a natural-justice violation and explained the petitioner’s failure to reply.

Source reference: para. 5

Since the appeal had been dismissed solely on limitation and the merits had not been considered, the Court found intervention warranted in the interests of justice.

Source reference: para. 6
05

Holding

The Court quashed the appellate order dated 25 March 2026 and the adjudication order dated 11 February 2025.

It directed the petitioner to reply to the show-cause notice within two weeks; the authority must consider the reply and issue a fresh reasoned order after affording a hearing within four weeks of receiving the reply, and communicate its decision within a further week.

Source reference: para. 7

The writ petition was disposed of accordingly.

Source reference: para. 8
06

Acts & Sections Cited

2 provisions across 2 statutes referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

West Bengal Goods And Services Tax Act, 20171

Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 20171

Calcutta High Court

Original Court PDF

SUFAL HALDERvsTHE DEPUTY COMMISSIIONER OF REVENUE, SALT LAKE CHARGE AND ORS

Calcutta High Court · October 12, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment