01Facts
The Department appealed under Section 112 of the CGST Act against the First Appellate Authority’s order allowing the taxpayer’s appeal and revoking cancellation of its GST registration.
¶ 1The registration had been cancelled after the taxpayer failed to file GSTR-3B returns for six consecutive months.
¶ 1The FAA had directed verification of the taxpayer’s filing of returns and payment of tax; the Department contended that interest, late fee and penalty under Rule 23(1) had also to be paid.
¶ 1–6The taxpayer did not appear before the Tribunal despite multiple hearing opportunities.
¶ 1–602Issues
i.1. Whether the FAA could allow the taxpayer’s appeal and restore its registration without ensuring payment of interest, late fee and penalty in addition to tax.
¶ 7, 9–10ii.2. Whether the Tribunal should modify the FAA’s order and impose a penalty in the circumstances of the case.
¶ 11.2–1203Law Applied
Rule 23(1) of the CGST Rules provides that, where registration was cancelled for failure to furnish returns, an application for revocation cannot be made unless the outstanding returns are furnished and tax due is paid together with applicable interest, penalty and late fee; it also prescribes the filing of subsequent returns after revocation.
¶ 9The Tribunal referred to Sections 50 and 47 of the Act as providing for interest and late fee, respectively, and to Section 79 as the statutory recovery mechanism for admitted dues.
¶ 11–11.2It also treated penalty as payable under Rule 23, although the judgment does not identify a separate penalty provision.
¶ 11.2Provisions in the judgment · 12 · Linked ones open on LawLens
Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 112Section 30Section 79Section 107Section 50Section 47
Goods and Services Tax (Compensation to States) Act, 2017 Section 112Section 30Section 79Section 107Section 50Section 47
04Reasoning
The Tribunal considered that the FAA had focused on verification of return filing and tax payment without expressly addressing the additional amounts contemplated by Rule 23(1).
¶ 10.1–11.2It held that the taxpayer had paid tax and filed returns but had not paid the applicable interest and late fee.
¶ 10.1–11.2The Tribunal observed that those amounts could be recovered under Sections 50 and 47, and stated that the taxpayer was additionally liable to a penalty.
¶ 10.1–11.2Although it discussed Section 79 as the mechanism for recovering admitted dues, it ultimately modified the FAA’s order and imposed a penalty.
¶ 10.1–11.205Holding
The Tribunal allowed the Department’s appeal and modified the FAA’s order to require payment of applicable interest and late fee, and imposed a penalty of ₹10,000, divided equally between Central and State tax (₹5,000 each).
¶ 11.2–15 · Form GST APL-04A, § IThe appeal was disposed of without an order as to costs.
¶ 11.2–15 · Form GST APL-04A, § IOriginal Court PDF
Md Qamaruddin KhanvsSRI UMAMAHESHWARA INFRATECH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
![GST Tribunal Imposes ₹10,000 Penalty After Taxpayer Files Returns And Pays Tax But Leaves Interest And Late Fee Unpaid. Md Qamaruddin Khan vs SRI UMAMAHESHWARA INFRATECH. GSTAT - ['Hyderabad']. LawLens](/stories/thumbnails/gst-tribunal-imposes-10-000-penalty-after-taxpayer-files-returns-and-pays-tax-but-leaves-i-da7544a5092c4d349d9c4dea99980e2a.webp)