Gujarat High CourtCriminal LawCriminal Procedure and Evidence

Gujarat HC Orders Truck Seized In Liquor Case Released To Registered Owner Pending Trial, Subject To Surety and No-Transfer Undertaking

RAMDEV NIMBARAM GURJARv.STATE OF GUJARAT

Gujarat HC Orders Truck Seized In Liquor Case Released To Registered Owner Pending Trial, Subject To Surety and No-Transfer Undertaking. RAMDEV NIMBARAM GURJAR vs STATE OF GUJARAT. Gujarat High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

Whether the seized vehicle could be released on interim custody despite the confiscation provisions of the Gujarat Prohibition Act.

The court held

The petition was allowed and the vehicle was ordered to be released upon the petitioner furnishing solvent surety equal to the vehicle’s price stated in the FIR, undertaking not to transfer it until final disposal of the trial, and producing it when directed.

It also directed

The police were directed to photograph the vehicle and prepare a panchnama at the petitioner’s cost; these materials were to form part of the charge-sheet papers.

The order also directed that the RTO be notified of the restraint on transfer, subject to any later permission by the trial court; the vehicle would stand confiscated in the event of a subsequent offence.

01Facts

The petitioner, claiming to be the vehicle’s registered owner, sought release of a Tata LPT 909 seized after police allegedly found its driver transporting liquor without a pass or permit.

pp. 1–2

An FIR was registered at Shamlaji Police Station under the Gujarat Prohibition Act.

pp. 1–2

The petitioner invoked Articles 14, 21 and 226 of the Constitution and Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023; the State opposed release by reference to the Act’s confiscation provisions.

pp. 1–2

02Issues

i.Whether the seized vehicle could be released on interim custody despite the confiscation provisions of the Gujarat Prohibition Act.

pp. 2–4

ii.If release was permissible, what conditions should govern the vehicle’s interim custody.

p. 4

03Law Applied

The Court relied on Article 226 of the Constitution and the principle in Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujarat, AIR 2003 SC 638, that seized vehicles should not remain unused in police premises and may be released on appropriate bonds, guarantees and security.

pp. 2–3

It also referred to Musa Khan Jat v. State of Gujarat, SCR.A/7190/2017, where the High Court released a vehicle under Articles 226 and 227.

p. 3

Citing M/s ABC Express v. State of Gujarat, 2026 LiveLaw (SC) 885, the Court noted that Section 98(2) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, is not an absolute bar to interim release, and that a court may order proper custody under Section 451 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Section 497 of the BNSS).

p. 4

Provisions in the judgment · 4 · Linked ones open on LawLens

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497Section 528

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Section 451

Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949. Section 98

04Reasoning

The Court treated the confiscation provisions as not preventing interim release, in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in M/s ABC Express.

pp. 2–4

It also considered the risk of deterioration from prolonged police custody, as addressed in Sunderbhai, and the coordinate Bench’s approach in Musa Khan Jat.

pp. 2–4

It therefore ordered release subject to safeguards intended to secure the vehicle’s availability, preserve evidence of its condition and prevent its transfer during trial.

pp. 2–4

05Holding

The petition was allowed and the vehicle was ordered to be released upon the petitioner furnishing solvent surety equal to the vehicle’s price stated in the FIR, undertaking not to transfer it until final disposal of the trial, and producing it when directed.

pp. 4–5

The police were directed to photograph the vehicle and prepare a panchnama at the petitioner’s cost; these materials were to form part of the charge-sheet papers.

pp. 4–5

The order also directed that the RTO be notified of the restraint on transfer, subject to any later permission by the trial court; the vehicle would stand confiscated in the event of a subsequent offence.

pp. 4–5
Gujarat High Court

Original Court PDF

RAMDEV NIMBARAM GURJARvsSTATE OF GUJARAT

Gujarat High Court · November 03, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment