Gujarat High CourtCriminal Procedure and EvidenceConstitutional Law

Gujarat HC Says Police Can Summon Shop-Dispute Petitioner Only By Written Notice

SHAHINBANU @ SHABANABANU ABDULREHMAN BELDARv.STATE OF GUJARAT

Gujarat HC Says Police Can Summon Shop-Dispute Petitioner Only By Written Notice. SHAHINBANU @ SHABANABANU ABDULREHMAN BELDAR vs STATE OF GUJARAT. Gujarat High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

Whether the Investigating Officer should be restrained from summoning the petitioner orally or by telephone, and required to issue written notice in accordance with law

The court held

The Court directed the Investigating Officer not to summon the petitioner orally or by telephone and required any future summons to be made by written notice in accordance with law

It also directed

The petition was disposed of and the Rule was made absolute accordingly

01Facts

The petitioners sought, among other reliefs, registration of an FIR, protection from interference with their possession of a shop, preservation of police-station CCTV footage, and an order preventing police from summoning them orally or by telephone

¶ 1 · pp. 1–2

They alleged that Respondent No. 4 repeatedly complained to the police and that the police frequently called the petitioner to the station, causing harassment

¶ 4, 6 · p. 3

The Investigating Officer’s report stated that the parties had made numerous complaints against each other—40 by Respondent No. 4 and 15 by the petitioner—and that preliminary inquiries and subsequent action had been taken according to law

¶ 5 · p. 3

02Issues

i.Whether the Investigating Officer should be restrained from summoning the petitioner orally or by telephone, and required to issue written notice in accordance with law

¶ 6–7 · p. 4

03Law Applied

The petition invoked Articles 14, 21, 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India and Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023

¶ 1 · p. 1

The Court directed that, if the petitioner was required to attend in response to any further complaint, the Investigating Officer could summon her only by written notice in accordance with law

¶ 7 · p. 4

Provisions in the judgment · 1 · Linked ones open on LawLens

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 528

04Reasoning

The Court considered the petitioner’s grievance that she was frequently called to the police station orally or by telephone, alongside the Investigating Officer’s report that both parties had made numerous complaints against each other and that the police had acted on them

¶ 5–6 · p. 3

Addressing only the manner in which the petitioner was summoned, the Court directed that any future summons be issued by written notice in accordance with law

¶ 7 · p. 4

05Holding

The Court directed the Investigating Officer not to summon the petitioner orally or by telephone and required any future summons to be made by written notice in accordance with law

¶ 7 · p. 4

The petition was disposed of and the Rule was made absolute accordingly

¶ 8 · p. 4
Gujarat High Court

Original Court PDF

SHAHINBANU @ SHABANABANU ABDULREHMAN BELDARvsSTATE OF GUJARAT

Gujarat High Court · November 03, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment