Punjab and Haryana High CourtSocial Security and PensionsAdministrative and Public Law

Haryana Sweeper Can Count Part-Time Service From 1988 Toward Old Pension After Regularisation, Subject To Verification: P&H HC

Dayal Kaurv.State Of Haryana And Ors

Haryana Sweeper Can Count Part-Time Service From 1988 Toward Old Pension After Regularisation, Subject To Verification: P&H HC. Dayal Kaur vs State Of Haryana And Ors. Punjab and Haryana High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

Whether the petitioner’s service rendered before regularization, followed by regular service, must be counted as qualifying service for pension and other retiral benefits.

The court held

The petition was allowed.

It also directed

The respondents were directed to count the petitioner’s service from her initial engagement through regularization, together with her subsequent regular service, as qualifying service for pension and other retiral benefits.

Subject to verification, she is entitled to OPS, and the respondents must re-fix and release the consequential benefits within three months of receiving a certified copy of the order.

Any amount already contributed or paid under the New Pension Scheme is to be adjusted in accordance with law.

01Facts

The petitioner was engaged as a part-time Sweeper in 1988 and was later regularized with effect from 04.05.2006.

pp. 1–5 · ¶ 2–5

She retired on superannuation on 30.11.2018.

pp. 1–5 · ¶ 2–5

Although she initially sought regularization from the date her junior was regularized, she ultimately confined her claim to pension under the Old Pension Scheme (OPS), seeking to have her pre-regularization service counted as qualifying service.

pp. 1–5 · ¶ 2–5

The State disputed her earlier eligibility for regularization but stated that OPS benefits could be granted following verification if the relevant facts were established.

pp. 1–5 · ¶ 2–5

02Issues

i.Whether the petitioner’s service rendered before regularization, followed by regular service, must be counted as qualifying service for pension and other retiral benefits.

p. 5 · ¶ 8 · p. 9 · ¶ 10

ii.Whether, on counting that service, the petitioner is entitled to OPS benefits, subject to verification of her service particulars.

pp. 4–5 · ¶ 4–5 · p. 10 · ¶ 12

03Law Applied

Rule 32 of the Haryana Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 2016 prescribes ten years of qualifying service for monthly pension.

p. 2 · ¶ 2

The Court relied on Kesar Chand v. State of Haryana, Harbans Lal v. State of Punjab, Jeewan Lata v. State of Punjab, Jai Bhagwan, Rajesh Kumar, and other cited decisions for the principle that continuous part-time, daily-wage, ad hoc, or temporary service preceding regularization may be counted as qualifying service when followed by regular service.

pp. 4–6 · ¶ 4, 8–9

It also relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in Punjab School Education Board v. Satnam Singh, which affirmed that pre-regularization service can count toward pension and that artificial or administrative breaks may be disregarded in appropriate circumstances.

pp. 6–9 · ¶ 9

04Reasoning

The Court found that the petitioner had initially served on a part-time, daily-wage, or ad hoc basis and was subsequently regularized.

p. 5 · ¶ 7

Applying the settled principle that continuous pre-regularization service followed by regular service is countable for pension, the Court held that the respondents could not exclude her earlier service when calculating qualifying service.

pp. 5–9 · ¶ 8–10

It treated the petitioner’s entitlement to OPS as subject to verification of the dates and factual particulars of her engagement and regularization.

p. 10 · ¶ 12

05Holding

The petition was allowed.

p. 10 · ¶ 11–13

The respondents were directed to count the petitioner’s service from her initial engagement through regularization, together with her subsequent regular service, as qualifying service for pension and other retiral benefits.

p. 10 · ¶ 11–13

Subject to verification, she is entitled to OPS, and the respondents must re-fix and release the consequential benefits within three months of receiving a certified copy of the order.

p. 10 · ¶ 11–13

Any amount already contributed or paid under the New Pension Scheme is to be adjusted in accordance with law.

p. 10 · ¶ 11–13
Punjab and Haryana High Court

Original Court PDF

Dayal KaurvsState Of Haryana And Ors

Punjab and Haryana High Court · November 12, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment