Facts
The petitioner, a vendor in Sarojini Nagar Market, sought a direction requiring the respondents to issue him a Certificate of Vending (CoV).
Source reference: p. 1–2NDMC stated that the survey had been completed and the petitioner had been found ineligible; it later questioned his identity on the basis of differences between his Aadhaar Card and Voter ID Card
Source reference: p. 2–3The Court noted that the petitioner was included in NDMC’s list of 628 street vendors identified as pre-existing vendors, but that photographs showed him occupying more space than permitted under the provisional CoV terms
Source reference: p. 4Issues
1. Whether the petitioner was entitled to a CoV despite NDMC’s finding of ineligibility and its stated concerns regarding his identity
Source reference: p. 2–32. Whether the petitioner could be permitted to vend pending consideration of his CoV application, and, if so, subject to what conditions
Source reference: p. 4Law Applied
The Court referred to the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014, in the context of protection afforded to vendors identified as pre-existing vendors
Source reference: p. 4It held that inclusion in the list of 628 vendors did not, by itself, confer a right to occupy more space than permitted or to cause obstruction or traffic congestion
Source reference: p. 4No statutory provision or precedent was expressly cited in the judgment
Source reference: no citationReasoning
The Court considered the petitioner’s inclusion in the list of pre-existing vendors but treated that inclusion as insufficient to justify his occupation of the larger area shown in the photographs.
Source reference: p. 4–5It therefore permitted vending only within a defined 4 × 6 ft. space, for selling ladies’ handbags, subject to maintaining cleanliness and avoiding traffic congestion.
Source reference: p. 4–5The Court left the merits of the CoV application to be considered by TVC-II once constituted
Source reference: p. 4–5Holding
The Court did not direct NDMC to issue a CoV.
It permitted the petitioner to sell ladies’ handbags within a 4 × 6 ft. space, subject to the stated conditions, and directed that TVC-II consider his case for a CoV after it is constituted.
Source reference: p. 4–5The petition and any pending applications were disposed of accordingly.
Source reference: p. 4–5Original Court PDF
Devender Singh Alias Dukhi SinghvsNew Delhi Municipal Council & Ors.
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
