Delhi High Court
Administrative and Public LawCivil Law

Inclusion on a pre-existing-vendor list does not permit vending beyond the prescribed space.

Devender Singh Alias Dukhi Singh vs New Delhi Municipal Council & Ors.

Delhi High CourtJUDGMENT: September 30, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Inclusion on a pre-existing-vendor list does not permit vending beyond the prescribed space.. Devender Singh Alias Dukhi Singh vs New Delhi Municipal Council  & Ors.. Delhi High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The petitioner, a vendor in Sarojini Nagar Market, sought a direction requiring the respondents to issue him a Certificate of Vending (CoV).

Source reference: p. 1–2

NDMC stated that the survey had been completed and the petitioner had been found ineligible; it later questioned his identity on the basis of differences between his Aadhaar Card and Voter ID Card

Source reference: p. 2–3

The Court noted that the petitioner was included in NDMC’s list of 628 street vendors identified as pre-existing vendors, but that photographs showed him occupying more space than permitted under the provisional CoV terms

Source reference: p. 4
02

Issues

1. Whether the petitioner was entitled to a CoV despite NDMC’s finding of ineligibility and its stated concerns regarding his identity

Source reference: p. 2–3

2. Whether the petitioner could be permitted to vend pending consideration of his CoV application, and, if so, subject to what conditions

Source reference: p. 4
03

Law Applied

The Court referred to the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014, in the context of protection afforded to vendors identified as pre-existing vendors

Source reference: p. 4

It held that inclusion in the list of 628 vendors did not, by itself, confer a right to occupy more space than permitted or to cause obstruction or traffic congestion

Source reference: p. 4

No statutory provision or precedent was expressly cited in the judgment

Source reference: no citation
04

Reasoning

The Court considered the petitioner’s inclusion in the list of pre-existing vendors but treated that inclusion as insufficient to justify his occupation of the larger area shown in the photographs.

Source reference: p. 4–5

It therefore permitted vending only within a defined 4 × 6 ft. space, for selling ladies’ handbags, subject to maintaining cleanliness and avoiding traffic congestion.

Source reference: p. 4–5

The Court left the merits of the CoV application to be considered by TVC-II once constituted

Source reference: p. 4–5
05

Holding

The Court did not direct NDMC to issue a CoV.

It permitted the petitioner to sell ladies’ handbags within a 4 × 6 ft. space, subject to the stated conditions, and directed that TVC-II consider his case for a CoV after it is constituted.

Source reference: p. 4–5

The petition and any pending applications were disposed of accordingly.

Source reference: p. 4–5
Delhi High Court

Original Court PDF

Devender Singh Alias Dukhi SinghvsNew Delhi Municipal Council & Ors.

Delhi High Court · September 30, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment