CAT - ['Jabalpur']
Social Security and PensionsAdministrative and Public Law

Interest is payable on gratuity delayed by administrative lapses, but not on other retiral dues.

AJAY KUMAR DUBEY vs M/o Defence

CAT - ['Jabalpur']JUDGMENT: September 28, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Interest is payable on gratuity delayed by administrative lapses, but not on other retiral dues.. AJAY KUMAR DUBEY vs M/o Defence. CAT - ['Jabalpur']. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicant, a Junior Works Manager (Technical), retired on 31 July 2018 while departmental proceedings initiated under Rule 14 of the CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965 were pending.

Source reference: p. 2–5

On retirement, the proceedings continued under Rule 9 of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972; the applicant received provisional pension, while gratuity, commuted pension and leave encashment were withheld.

Source reference: p. 2–5

The disciplinary authority dropped the charges on 29 October 2019, and the suspension period was treated as spent on duty.

Source reference: p. 2–5

The respondents subsequently paid the applicant’s gratuity, commuted pension, leave encashment and salary for the suspension period.

Source reference: p. 2–5

The applicant sought interest on the delayed payments.

Source reference: p. 2–5
02

Issues

1. Whether the applicant was entitled to interest on delayed payment of gratuity.

Source reference: p. 5–6

2. Whether the applicant was entitled to interest on delayed payment of commuted pension, leave encashment and salary for the suspension period.

Source reference: p. 5–6
03

Law Applied

Rule 65(1) of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 2021 provides for interest on delayed payment of pension, family pension or gratuity where payment is made later than it became due and the delay is clearly attributable to administrative reasons or lapses.

Source reference: p. 6

The Tribunal construed the rule as providing for interest on gratuity, but not on other retiral dues.

Source reference: p. 6
04

Reasoning

The Tribunal noted that the departmental charges had been dropped and that the withheld payments were made after the disciplinary authority’s order, generally within about three months of that order.

Source reference: p. 5–6

Although the applicant claimed that the payments had been delayed for approximately two years from retirement, the Tribunal applied Rule 65(1) to distinguish gratuity from the other claimed dues.

Source reference: p. 5–6

It allowed interest on gratuity but found no provision under the cited rule for interest on commuted pension, leave encashment or salary for the suspension period.

Source reference: p. 5–6
05

Holding

The Original Application was partly allowed.

The respondents were directed to pay interest on the gratuity amount at 6% from the date it became due, and to complete the exercise within 90 days of receiving a certified copy of the order.

Source reference: p. 6

No interest was awarded on the other claimed payments; there was no order as to costs.

Source reference: p. 6
CAT - ['Jabalpur']

Original Court PDF

AJAY KUMAR DUBEYvsM/o Defence

CAT - ['Jabalpur'] · September 28, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment