Facts
The applicant, the widow of late Sh. Anil Kumar (a former employee of BSNL), filed an Original Application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985
Source reference: p.3She sought to set aside communications dated 11.06.2024 and 27.01.2025, which had rejected her claim for family pension, death gratuity, and other terminal benefits following her husband's demise
Source reference: p.3During the pendency of the proceedings, the respondents placed on record a Pension Payment Order (PPO) issued in favor of the applicant
Source reference: p.3-4Issues
1. Whether the applicant is entitled to the disbursement of family pension and death gratuity under the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972
Source reference: p.32. Whether the grievance raised in the Original Application survives following the issuance of the Pension Payment Order by the respondents
Source reference: p.3-4Law Applied
The Tribunal’s jurisdiction was invoked under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985
Source reference: p.3The substantive entitlement of the applicant was governed by the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972, which provide for the grant of family pension and death gratuity to the spouse of a deceased government servant
Source reference: p.3Reasoning
The Tribunal evaluated the applicant's prayer for the release of terminal benefits against the subsequent actions taken by the respondents.
Source reference: p.4Upon the respondents producing the Pension Payment Order (PPO) during the hearing, the Tribunal noted that the primary relief sought—the approval and disbursement of pensionary benefits—had been effectively granted
Source reference: p.4The Tribunal reasoned that since the PPO had been formally issued and placed on record, the core grievance of the applicant stood "substantially addressed," making further adjudication on the merits of the previous rejection letters unnecessary at this stage
Source reference: p.4Holding
The Tribunal held that the issuance of the Pension Payment Order satisfied the applicant's primary claim
Consequently, the Original Application was disposed of as the grievance was resolved
Source reference: p.4The Tribunal granted liberty to the applicant to agitate any surviving grievances in accordance with the law and ordered no costs
Source reference: p.4Original Court PDF
ALKA aliAS NANDINIvsBHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in