Karnataka High CourtCivil Procedure and EvidenceConstitutional Law

Karnataka HC Dismisses Bidar D.El.Ed. Colleges’ And Students’ Challenge To Endorsements Over Unresolved Filing Objections

KARNATAKA D.EL.ED COLLEGE AND ORSv.STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS

Karnataka HC Dismisses Bidar D.El.Ed. Colleges’ And Students’ Challenge To Endorsements Over Unresolved Filing Objections. KARNATAKA D.EL.ED COLLEGE AND ORS vs STATE OF KARNATAKA  AND ORS. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

1. Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for failure to comply with office objections despite a final extension of time.

The court held

The Court answered the procedural issue in the affirmative and dismissed the writ petition for non-compliance with office objections.

It also directed

It granted no substantive relief and made no determination on the validity of the challenged endorsements.

01Facts

The petitioners—five D.El.Ed. colleges and their students—filed a petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution seeking, among other reliefs, certiorari to quash endorsements dated 30 June 2023 issued by the District Institute of Educational and Research and Training, Bidar.

p. 26

On 16 September 2026, the Court granted a final extension until 19 October 2026 to comply with office objections, directing that the petition be listed for dismissal if they were not complied with. The objections remained outstanding when the matter came before the Court.

p. 27

02Issues

i.1. Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for failure to comply with office objections despite a final extension of time.

p. 27

03Law Applied

The petition invoked Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, but the Court did not address their substantive scope or cite any statute or precedent in deciding the matter.

The Court applied its prior procedural order granting a final deadline for compliance and directing that non-compliance would result in the petition being listed for dismissal.

p. 27

04Reasoning

The Court noted that the petition had been listed for non-compliance with office objections for the fourth time.

p. 27

It had already granted sufficient time, including a final extension to 19 October 2026, and the petitioners had not complied with the objections. The Court therefore disposed of the petition on that procedural ground without considering the challenge to the endorsements on its merits.

p. 27

05Holding

The Court answered the procedural issue in the affirmative and dismissed the writ petition for non-compliance with office objections.

p. 27

It granted no substantive relief and made no determination on the validity of the challenged endorsements.

p. 27
Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

KARNATAKA D.EL.ED COLLEGE AND ORSvsSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS

Karnataka High Court · October 27, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment