Karnataka High CourtTransport, Maritime, and Aviation LawCivil Law

Karnataka HC Raises Compensation To Rs 3.37 Lakh For 55-Year-Old Pedestrian Injured By KSRTC Bus

DIVISIONAL MANAGERv.SHANKARAPPA

Karnataka HC Raises Compensation To Rs 3.37 Lakh For 55-Year-Old Pedestrian Injured By KSRTC Bus. DIVISIONAL MANAGER vs SHANKARAPPA. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

1. Whether the compensation awarded by the Tribunal required enhancement, including by reassessing notional income and compensation under the relevant heads.

The court held

The Court modified the Tribunal’s award and fixed total compensation at Rs. 3,37,100, with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the petition until realization, excluding the delayed period of 128 days.

It also directed

The Insurance Company was directed to deposit the compensation within six weeks of receiving the certified judgment.

The appeal was disposed of.

01Facts

On 24 March 2015, Shankarappa, then aged about 55, was struck by a KSRTC bus while crossing a road in Hunsur and sustained multiple fractures and other injuries.

pp. 3–4 · ¶ 3

He was treated as an inpatient from 24 to 29 March 2015.

pp. 3–4 · ¶ 3

The Tribunal awarded him Rs. 2,01,500 with interest at 6% per annum.

p. 3 · ¶ 1

The judgment contains inconsistencies about the appellant: its cause title names the KSRTC Divisional Manager, while the opening paragraph describes the claimant as the appellant seeking enhancement; it also refers to the Insurance Company filing the appeal.

p. 1 · p. 3 · ¶ 1 · p. 4 · ¶ 3

02Issues

i.1. Whether the compensation awarded by the Tribunal required enhancement, including by reassessing notional income and compensation under the relevant heads.

p. 5 · ¶ 7 · pp. 6–7 · ¶ 8–9

ii.2. Whether the Tribunal’s assessment of disability-related loss of future income required interference.

pp. 4–5 · ¶ 5–6 · pp. 6–7 · ¶ 8–9

03Law Applied

The Court considered the claim and appeal under the Motor Vehicles Act, including Section 173(1), identified in the appeal description.

p. 2

It applied the KSLSA guidelines for notional income, taking the 2015 monthly notional income as Rs. 9,000.

p. 6 · ¶ 8

For loss of future income due to disability, it used the multiplier method, applying the monthly income, 12 months, a multiplier of 13, and a disability factor of 15%.

pp. 6–7 · ¶ 8–9

The judgment cites no precedent or further statutory provision.

Provisions in the judgment · 1 · Linked ones open on LawLens

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173

04Reasoning

The Court found that the claimant’s asserted agricultural income of Rs. 1,50,000 per annum was not established by the RTC, which showed no standing crops.

p. 6 · ¶ 8

It therefore applied the KSLSA notional income of Rs. 9,000 per month instead of the Tribunal’s Rs. 6,000.

p. 6 · ¶ 8

Although the disability certificate recorded 65% whole-body disability, the Court retained a 15% disability factor in calculating future income loss, yielding Rs. 2,10,600 (Rs. 9,000 × 12 × 13 × 15%).

pp. 6–7 · ¶ 8–9

It also increased compensation for pain and suffering, loss of income during the laid-up period, and loss of amenities, while leaving medical expenses and conveyance, nourishment and attendant charges unchanged.

p. 7 · ¶ 9

05Holding

The Court modified the Tribunal’s award and fixed total compensation at Rs. 3,37,100, with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the petition until realization, excluding the delayed period of 128 days.

pp. 7–8 · ¶ 10

The Insurance Company was directed to deposit the compensation within six weeks of receiving the certified judgment.

p. 8 · ¶ 10

The appeal was disposed of.

pp. 7–8 · ¶ 10
Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

DIVISIONAL MANAGERvsSHANKARAPPA

Karnataka High Court · October 07, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment