01Facts
The appellant filed an appeal under Order XLIII Rule 1(d) CPC challenging the Principal Senior Civil Judge and CJM, Mangaluru’s order dated 7 April 2025 dismissing her petition under Order IX Rule 13 read with Section 151 CPC
p. 6The High Court considered whether it could entertain the appeal and, finding it not maintainable before it, directed transfer of the case record to the District Court
pp. 7–802Issues
i.1. Whether the appeal was maintainable before the High Court under Section 19(1) of the Karnataka Civil Courts Act, 1964
p. 7ii.2. Whether the matter should be transferred to the competent District Court for adjudication
pp. 7–803Law Applied
The Court relied on Section 19(1) of the Karnataka Civil Courts Act, 1964
p. 7the Division Bench decision in Smt. Narayanamma v. State of Karnataka, W.P. No. 17588 of 2024 c/w W.A. No. 200260 of 2025, dated 8 July 2026, which had been affirmed by the Supreme Court in SLP(C) No. 025075/2026 on 3 August 2026
p. 7Applying these authorities, the Court held that the appeal was not maintainable before the High Court
p. 7Provisions in the judgment · 2 · Linked ones open on LawLens
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Section 151
KARNATAKA CIVIL COURTS ACT, 1964 Section 19
04Reasoning
The Court applied Section 19(1) and the cited, Supreme Court-affirmed precedent to conclude that this appeal lay outside its jurisdiction
p. 7Rather than determine the merits, it directed transfer of the record to the Principal District and Sessions Judge for assignment to the competent appellate court, preserving the parties’ rights and contentions
pp. 7–805Holding
The Court held that the appeal was not maintainable before it and disposed of it for statistical purposes
pp. 7–8It directed the Registry to transfer the full record, including any pending applications, to the concerned Principal District and Sessions Judge for assignment to the competent appellate court; it made no observations on the merits and left all contentions open
p. 8The matter was listed before the District Court on 30 November 2026
p. 8Original Court PDF
MRS CYRILLA MATILDA PEREIRAvsSTANY PINTO
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
