01Facts
The appeals arose from an order dated 17 August 2022 on an application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure in O.S. No. 192/2021 before the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Sidlaghatta.
pp. 2–4Rathnamma appealed against the order partly allowing the application; M.V. Nagaraju filed the connected appeal challenging the order allowing it.
pp. 2–4The High Court considered the appeals’ maintainability and directed their transfer to the competent District Court.
p. 502Issues
i.1. Whether the appeals against the interlocutory order were maintainable before the High Court under Section 19(1) of the Karnataka Civil Courts Act, 1964.
p. 5ii.2. If not maintainable before the High Court, whether the appeals and any pending applications should be transferred to the competent appellate court for adjudication.
pp. 5–603Law Applied
The Court relied on Section 19(1) of the Karnataka Civil Courts Act, 1964, and the Division Bench decision in Smt. Narayanamma v. State of Karnataka, W.P. No. 17588/2024 c/w W.A. No. 200260/2025, dated 8 July 2026, which the Supreme Court had affirmed in SLP(C) No. 025075/2026 on 3 August 2026.
p. 5The Court treated these authorities as establishing that the appeals were not maintainable before it and should be placed before the competent District Court for adjudication.
p. 5Provisions in the judgment · 2 · Linked ones open on LawLens
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Section 151
KARNATAKA CIVIL COURTS ACT, 1964 Section 19
04Reasoning
Applying Section 19(1) and the cited Narayanamma decision, the Court concluded that it could not adjudicate these appeals.
p. 5It therefore directed the Registry to transmit the records to the Principal District and Sessions Judge, who could assign them to the appellate court with jurisdiction.
pp. 5–6Any pending applications were also to be transferred for consideration according to law.
pp. 5–6The Court expressly left the merits and the parties’ contentions open.
pp. 5–605Holding
The Court held that the appeals were not maintainable before it and disposed of them for statistical purposes.
pp. 6–7It directed transfer of the records and any pending applications to the competent District Court, with the parties to appear before the District Judge on 20 November 2026 without further notice.
pp. 6–7The interim order granted by the High Court was to continue until disposal of the application before the District Court; no opinion was expressed on the merits.
pp. 6–7Original Court PDF
SHRI M V NAGARAJUvsSMT RATHNAMMA
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
