Chhattisgarh High CourtTransport, Maritime, and Aviation LawCivil Law

Left-Hand Fracture: Chhattisgarh HC Adds ₹98,145 To Accident Victim’s Compensation, Raising It To ₹2.4 Lakh.

RAVINDRA BASHANIv.SUNIL KUMAR RAIDAS

Left-Hand Fracture: Chhattisgarh HC Adds ₹98,145 To Accident Victim’s Compensation, Raising It To ₹2.4 Lakh.. RAVINDRA BASHANI vs SUNIL KUMAR RAIDAS. Chhattisgarh High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

1. Whether the compensation awarded by the Claims Tribunal was inadequate and required enhancement

The court held

The appeal was partly allowed. Total compensation was enhanced from ₹1,41,855 to ₹2,40,000, entitling the claimant to an additional ₹98,145, with interest at 6% per annum from the date of filing the claim application until realization.

It also directed

The remaining terms of the Tribunal’s award were left unchanged, and the Registry was directed to communicate the enhanced amount to the claimant in Hindi

01Facts

The claimant sustained a fracture to his left hand in a road accident on 25 January 2020.

¶ 1–3

The Claims Tribunal awarded him ₹1,41,855 in compensation. He appealed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking enhancement, including compensation for loss of income during treatment and future treatment. The insurer opposed the appeal

¶ 1–3

02Issues

i.1. Whether the compensation awarded by the Claims Tribunal was inadequate and required enhancement

¶ 2, 5–8

ii.2. Whether the claimant was entitled to additional compensation for loss of income during treatment and future treatment

¶ 2, 5

03Law Applied

The appeal was brought under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988

¶ 1

The Court assessed compensation under the relevant heads by determining what amounts were just and proper in light of the claimant’s injury, treatment and circumstances; it cited no precedent or further statutory provision

¶ 5–8

Provisions in the judgment · 1 · Linked ones open on LawLens

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173

04Reasoning

The Court found that the fracture would have caused some loss of income during treatment, a head for which the Tribunal had made no award, and allowed ₹30,000. It also allowed ₹15,000 for future treatment, considering the claimant’s need for follow-up visits.

¶ 5–7

Given his treatment at Apollo Hospital in Bilaspur and the expenditure incurred, the Court increased medical expenses from ₹1,37,855 to ₹1,40,000, transportation from ₹1,000 to ₹20,000, special diet from ₹1,000 to ₹10,000, and pain and suffering from ₹2,000 to ₹25,000

¶ 5–7

05Holding

The appeal was partly allowed. Total compensation was enhanced from ₹1,41,855 to ₹2,40,000, entitling the claimant to an additional ₹98,145, with interest at 6% per annum from the date of filing the claim application until realization.

¶ 8–10

The remaining terms of the Tribunal’s award were left unchanged, and the Registry was directed to communicate the enhanced amount to the claimant in Hindi

¶ 8–10
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

RAVINDRA BASHANIvsSUNIL KUMAR RAIDAS

Chhattisgarh High Court · November 02, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment