Madras High CourtAdministrative and Public LawProperty and Real Estate Law

Madras HC Disposes Plea Over Encroachments On Three Waterbodies And A Cart Track After Officials Report Their Removal

NALLAMMALv.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR

Madras HC Disposes Plea Over Encroachments On Three Waterbodies And A Cart Track After Officials Report Their Removal. NALLAMMAL vs THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR. Madras High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

1. Whether the revenue authorities should be directed to remove the alleged encroachments from the specified water bodies and cart track

The court held

The writ petition was disposed of following the submission that the encroachments had been removed.

It also directed

The Court made no separate order granting patta cancellation or further relief; there was no order as to costs, and any connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.

01Facts

The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing the revenue authorities to remove alleged encroachments by respondents 5–69 from water bodies in Survey Nos. 88/1, 88/2 and 73, and from a cart track in Survey No. 116 at Nannai village, and to cancel pattas issued in relation to the alleged encroachments.

p. 5

The request relied on the petitioner’s representation dated 30 June 2025.

p. 5

At the hearing, the Additional Government Pleader, relying on the Tahsildar’s written instructions and photographs, informed the Court that the encroachments had been removed on 7 October 2026 in the presence of competent authorities.

p. 5

02Issues

i.1. Whether the revenue authorities should be directed to remove the alleged encroachments from the specified water bodies and cart track

p. 5

ii.2. Whether the Court should direct cancellation of pattas allegedly connected with those encroachments

p. 5

03Law Applied

The petition invoked the High Court’s jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking mandamus against public authorities.

p. 5

The Court did not set out or apply any further statutory provision, precedent, or substantive test concerning encroachment removal or patta cancellation in its order.

p. 5

04Reasoning

The Court recorded the State’s submission, supported by the Tahsildar’s written instructions and photographs, that the subject encroachments had already been removed.

p. 5

In light of that submission, it disposed of the petition without separately examining the alleged encroachments, the petitioner’s request for patta cancellation, or the merits of the underlying claims.

p. 5

05Holding

The writ petition was disposed of following the submission that the encroachments had been removed.

p. 5

The Court made no separate order granting patta cancellation or further relief; there was no order as to costs, and any connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.

p. 5
Madras High Court

Original Court PDF

NALLAMMALvsTHE DISTRICT COLLECTOR

Madras High Court · November 05, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment