01Facts
The respondent-husband filed H.M.O.P. No. 105 of 2026 for divorce before the Sub Court, Thiruvarur.
p. 2The petitioner-wife, who was residing with the parties’ six-year-old daughter in Thanjavur, sought transfer of the divorce petition to the Family Court, Thanjavur, where her maintenance case was pending.
pp. 2–4The husband opposed transfer, alleging that the wife had left the matrimonial home without cause and that he feared a threat from her parents in Thanjavur; he offered to pay her travel expenses.
pp. 2–4The wife brought this transfer petition under Section 24 read with Section 151 CPC.
p. 102Issues
i.Whether the divorce petition pending before the Sub Court, Thiruvarur, should be transferred to the Family Court, Thanjavur, having regard to the wife’s convenience and the circumstances of the parties.
pp. 4–5ii.Whether the husband’s asserted apprehension of a threat in Thanjavur was sufficient to outweigh the wife’s request for transfer.
p. 503Law Applied
The Court considered its transfer power under Section 24 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
p. 4It applied the settled principle that, in transfer petitions arising from matrimonial disputes, the wife’s convenience should receive predominant consideration. The judgment refers to this as a settled principle of the Supreme Court but does not identify a specific precedent.
p. 4Provisions in the judgment · 2 · Linked ones open on LawLens
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Section 24Section 151
04Reasoning
The wife was residing in Thanjavur with the parties’ young daughter, who attended school there, and her maintenance case was already pending before the Family Court, Thanjavur.
pp. 4–5The husband did not specifically deny the wife’s residence and the child’s schooling.
pp. 4–5Although he relied on an apprehension of threats and a police complaint, he produced no material showing that a case had been registered following any incident against him.
pp. 4–5Applying the principle favouring the wife’s convenience in matrimonial transfers, the Court found transfer appropriate.
pp. 4–505Holding
The Court allowed the transfer petition and withdrew H.M.O.P. No. 105 of 2026 from the Sub Court, Thiruvarur, transferring it to the Family Court, Thanjavur, for disposal in accordance with law.
p. 5The Sub Court was directed to transmit the records within two weeks of receiving the order.
p. 5No costs were awarded, and the connected CMP was closed.
p. 5Original Court PDF
Suriya Praba,vsDeepan Chakravarthi,
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
