Madras High CourtCivil Procedure and EvidenceFamily Law

Madras HC Moves Husband’s Divorce Case to Thanjavur, Where Wife Lives With Their 6-Year-Old Daughter

Suriya Praba,v.Deepan Chakravarthi,

Madras HC Moves Husband’s Divorce Case to Thanjavur, Where Wife Lives With Their 6-Year-Old Daughter. Suriya Praba, vs Deepan Chakravarthi,. Madras High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

Whether the divorce petition pending before the Sub Court, Thiruvarur, should be transferred to the Family Court, Thanjavur, having regard to the wife’s convenience and the circumstances of the parties.

The court held

The Court allowed the transfer petition and withdrew H.M.O.P. No. 105 of 2026 from the Sub Court, Thiruvarur, transferring it to the Family Court, Thanjavur, for disposal in accordance with law.

It also directed

The Sub Court was directed to transmit the records within two weeks of receiving the order.

No costs were awarded, and the connected CMP was closed.

01Facts

The respondent-husband filed H.M.O.P. No. 105 of 2026 for divorce before the Sub Court, Thiruvarur.

p. 2

The petitioner-wife, who was residing with the parties’ six-year-old daughter in Thanjavur, sought transfer of the divorce petition to the Family Court, Thanjavur, where her maintenance case was pending.

pp. 2–4

The husband opposed transfer, alleging that the wife had left the matrimonial home without cause and that he feared a threat from her parents in Thanjavur; he offered to pay her travel expenses.

pp. 2–4

The wife brought this transfer petition under Section 24 read with Section 151 CPC.

p. 1

02Issues

i.Whether the divorce petition pending before the Sub Court, Thiruvarur, should be transferred to the Family Court, Thanjavur, having regard to the wife’s convenience and the circumstances of the parties.

pp. 4–5

ii.Whether the husband’s asserted apprehension of a threat in Thanjavur was sufficient to outweigh the wife’s request for transfer.

p. 5

03Law Applied

The Court considered its transfer power under Section 24 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

p. 4

It applied the settled principle that, in transfer petitions arising from matrimonial disputes, the wife’s convenience should receive predominant consideration. The judgment refers to this as a settled principle of the Supreme Court but does not identify a specific precedent.

p. 4

Provisions in the judgment · 2 · Linked ones open on LawLens

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Section 24Section 151

04Reasoning

The wife was residing in Thanjavur with the parties’ young daughter, who attended school there, and her maintenance case was already pending before the Family Court, Thanjavur.

pp. 4–5

The husband did not specifically deny the wife’s residence and the child’s schooling.

pp. 4–5

Although he relied on an apprehension of threats and a police complaint, he produced no material showing that a case had been registered following any incident against him.

pp. 4–5

Applying the principle favouring the wife’s convenience in matrimonial transfers, the Court found transfer appropriate.

pp. 4–5

05Holding

The Court allowed the transfer petition and withdrew H.M.O.P. No. 105 of 2026 from the Sub Court, Thiruvarur, transferring it to the Family Court, Thanjavur, for disposal in accordance with law.

p. 5

The Sub Court was directed to transmit the records within two weeks of receiving the order.

p. 5

No costs were awarded, and the connected CMP was closed.

p. 5
Madras High Court

Original Court PDF

Suriya Praba,vsDeepan Chakravarthi,

Madras High Court · November 02, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment