01Facts
The petitioner challenged the second respondent’s refusal check slip dated 5 October 2026, which refused registration of a sale deed for 25.10 cents of agricultural punja land under Section 22-A of the Registration Act, 1908.
pp. 1–2The stated ground was that the property was conveyed as a residential plot or for residential use without planning-authority approval.
pp. 1–2The petitioner contended that the land was being conveyed without changing its use.
pp. 1–202Issues
i.Whether the refusal to register the sale deed under Section 22-A, on the ground that the land was conveyed for residential use without planning approval, could stand where the petitioner claimed no change of use was intended.
p. 2ii.Whether registration could be directed subject to undertakings restricting change of use until planning permission was obtained.
pp. 2–403Law Applied
Section 22-A of the Registration Act, 1908, was the basis for the refusal under challenge.
p. 2The Court relied on Sankarakumar & another v. The Sub-Registrar, Panpozhi, W.P.(MD) No. 29522 of 2025, dated 17 April 2026, which balanced property rights under Article 300-A of the Constitution against development-control legislation.
pp. 2–3Under that decision, where the parties intend to convey land without changing its nature or use, the document may be registered subject to the claimant’s undertaking not to use or develop the land for residential, commercial, or other changed purposes without the required planning permission.
pp. 2–3Provisions in the judgment · 1
Registration Act, 1908 Section 22A
04Reasoning
Applying Sankarakumar, the Court treated the petitioner’s contention that the land was conveyed without a change of use as sufficient to set aside the refusal, subject to safeguards.
pp. 2–4It required the claimant in whose favour title would vest to give a notarised undertaking in four sets, including that the land would not be used or developed for a different purpose without planning permission and that utility connections or services would not be claimed without due conversion.
pp. 2–4The Court also directed that the land be described in the document as Nanjai or Punjai, rather than Manai, and that the undertaking form part of the registered document.
p. 405Holding
The writ petition was allowed and the refusal check slip was set aside.
pp. 4–5The claimant must file one set of the notarised affidavit before the Court within four weeks of receiving the web copy; after that filing, the petitioner may obtain a certified copy and represent the document with the remaining affidavit sets.
pp. 4–5The Sub-Registrar must register the document if there is no other impediment.
pp. 4–5The affidavit must be scanned and uploaded with the document, and the other sets must be sent to the local authority and the jurisdictional TANGEDCO Assistant Engineer.
pp. 4–5No costs were ordered.
pp. 4–5Original Court PDF
L.KavithavsThe District Registrar (Admi
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
