Karnataka High Court
Family LawCivil Procedure and Evidence

Maintenance award upheld; husband must pay ₹50,000 in medical expenses and the children’s school fees.

SHRI UTTAM S/O MAHADEV PATIL vs SMT. URMILA ALIYAS SAROJA W/O UTTAM PATIL

Karnataka High CourtJUDGMENT: October 01, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Maintenance award upheld; husband must pay ₹50,000 in medical expenses and the children’s school fees.. SHRI UTTAM S/O MAHADEV PATIL vs SMT. URMILA  ALIYAS SAROJA W/O UTTAM PATIL. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The Family Court, Belagavi, ordered the husband to pay monthly maintenance of ₹10,000 to his wife and ₹5,000 to each of their three children in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 120/2022.

Source reference: p. 2–7

The wife and children sought enhancement, contending that the husband was a teacher earning approximately ₹1,18,000 per month and that the wife had medical needs while the children had educational expenses.

Source reference: p. 2–7

The husband sought dismissal or reduction of the award, relying on his salary evidence and the wife’s admission that he had paid certain school expenses and provided clothes.

Source reference: p. 2–7

Both parties challenged the Family Court’s order under Section 19(4) of the Family Courts Act, 1984.

Source reference: p. 2–7
02

Issues

1. Whether the Family Court’s award of ₹25,000 per month in total should be enhanced at the wife and children’s request or reduced at the husband’s request.

Source reference: p. 4–7

2. Whether the husband should be directed to pay the wife’s medical expenses and the children’s school fees in addition to the monthly maintenance.

Source reference: p. 7–8
03

Law Applied

Both revisions were brought under Section 19(4) of the Family Courts Act, 1984.

Source reference: p. 2–3

The judgment does not identify or apply any separate substantive maintenance provision, precedent, or articulated legal test. It assesses the maintenance award by reference to the parties’ evidence concerning the husband’s income, the family’s needs, and expenses already paid.

Source reference: p. 5–7
04

Reasoning

The Court considered the husband’s salary evidence, including the salary slip showing a gross figure of ₹1,18,599 and a net amount of ₹68,638, as well as the evidence that he had paid some educational expenses and provided clothes to the children. On the record, it found no basis either to increase the aggregate monthly maintenance of ₹25,000 or to reduce it.

Source reference: p. 5–7

Separately, considering the wife’s request concerning her operation and the children’s educational expenses, the Court directed payment of ₹50,000 toward the wife’s medical expenses and payment of school fees upon production of institutional receipts.

Source reference: p. 7–8
05

Holding

The Court declined to enhance or reduce the monthly maintenance award of ₹25,000 and disposed of both revision petitions accordingly.

It directed the husband to pay ₹50,000 toward the wife’s medical expenses within two weeks, pay the children’s school fees upon production of receipts, and deposit any outstanding maintenance arrears. It recorded that the ₹50,000 could be deducted from any medical-expense award sought in the pending matrimonial case.

Source reference: p. 7–8
06

Acts & Sections Cited

1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Family Courts Act, 19841

Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

SHRI UTTAM S/O MAHADEV PATILvsSMT. URMILA ALIYAS SAROJA W/O UTTAM PATIL

Karnataka High Court · October 01, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment