Karnataka High Court
Criminal LawFamily Law

Matrimonial criminal proceedings may be quashed under Section 482 CrPC upon voluntary settlement.

SRI ANJAN P @ DHARSHAN P vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Karnataka High CourtJUDGMENT: October 08, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Matrimonial criminal proceedings may be quashed under Section 482 CrPC upon voluntary settlement.. SRI ANJAN P @ DHARSHAN P vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The wife’s complaint led to Crime No. 380 of 2023 and, following investigation, proceedings in C.C. No. 24908 of 2023 against the husband and other petitioners for alleged offences under Sections 498-A, 504 and 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

Source reference: p. 5

The petitioners sought to quash those proceedings under Section 482 CrPC.

Source reference: p. 5

The parties later reported that they had settled their matrimonial dispute, filed a joint petition for divorce by mutual consent, and agreed to withdraw their respective cases.

Source reference: pp. 6–8

In the connected petition concerning the wife’s maintenance proceeding, the husband sought withdrawal after reporting the settlement.

Source reference: p. 4
02

Issues

1. Whether the criminal proceedings in C.C. No. 24908 of 2023 should be quashed under Section 482 CrPC in view of the parties’ voluntary settlement.

Source reference: pp. 5–8

2. Whether Crl.P. No. 3328 of 2024 should be dismissed as withdrawn following the petitioner’s request and the reported settlement.

Source reference: p. 4
03

Law Applied

Section 482 CrPC preserves the High Court’s inherent power to make orders necessary to secure the ends of justice.

Source reference: p. 5

Section 320 CrPC provides for compounding specified offences, but the petitioners also invoked the High Court’s inherent jurisdiction in seeking quashing of the proceedings.

Source reference: p. 5

The court identified the alleged offences as those under Sections 498-A, 504 and 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

Source reference: p. 5

No precedent was cited in the order.

Source reference: no citation
04

Reasoning

The parties appeared through counsel and jointly represented that they had settled the dispute voluntarily, without coercion or undue influence.

Source reference: pp. 6–8

They had agreed to pursue divorce by mutual consent, resolve the financial terms of their separation, and withdraw their cases against each other.

Source reference: pp. 6–8

Considering the settlement and the parties’ stated wish to end the dispute, the court held that continuation of the criminal proceedings was unnecessary and that exercising its inherent jurisdiction would secure the ends of justice.

Source reference: p. 8
05

Holding

The court dismissed Crl.P. No. 3328 of 2024 as withdrawn.

It allowed Crl.P. No. 10842 of 2023 and quashed, as against the petitioners, the proceedings in C.C. No. 24908 of 2023 arising from Crime No. 380 of 2023.

Source reference: p. 9
06

Acts & Sections Cited

6 provisions across 3 statutes referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Code of Criminal Procedure, 19732

Indian Penal Code, 18602

Dowry Prohibition Act, 19612

Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

SRI ANJAN P @ DHARSHAN PvsTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Karnataka High Court · October 08, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment