Chhattisgarh High Court
Transport, Maritime, and Aviation LawCivil Law

Missing receipts do not bar reasonable incidental-expense compensation for an injured minor.

MINOR THANDA RAM @ ANSU YADAV vs GOPAL SAHU

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: September 26, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Missing receipts do not bar reasonable incidental-expense compensation for an injured minor.. MINOR THANDA RAM @ ANSU YADAV vs GOPAL SAHU. Chhattisgarh High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The four-year-old claimant sustained fractures of the right tibia and fibula in a motor-vehicle accident on 10 September 2020.

Source reference: para. 1

The Claims Tribunal awarded ₹20,000, comprising compensation for physical and mental suffering.

Source reference: paras. 1–2

The claimant appealed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking enhancement, including compensation for his father’s lost income during treatment, transportation, attendant charges, special diet, and future treatment expenses.

Source reference: paras. 1–2, 5

The insurer opposed enhancement, noting the absence of documentary evidence of medical expenses.

Source reference: para. 3
02

Issues

Whether the compensation awarded for the claimant’s injuries should be enhanced to account for expenses and losses associated with his treatment, despite the absence of documentary proof of medical expenses.

Source reference: paras. 2–5

Whether the enhanced compensation should carry interest, and at what rate and from what date.

Source reference: para. 7
03

Law Applied

The appeal was brought under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, which provides for an appeal from an award of a Claims Tribunal.

Source reference: para. 1

The Court applied the principle that compensation may account for reasonable miscellaneous out-of-pocket expenses arising from hospitalisation and treatment even where formal receipts are unavailable, having regard to the nature of the injuries and the circumstances shown by the record.

Source reference: para. 5

No precedent was cited.

Source reference: no citation
04

Reasoning

The MLC and X-ray reports established fractures of the claimant’s right tibia and fibula.

Source reference: para. 5

Although the claimant had not produced documentary proof of medical expenses, the Court considered it reasonable to infer that a four-year-old with those injuries was unable to perform normal activities for about two months.

Source reference: para. 5

It also recognised that treatment and hospitalisation commonly entail miscellaneous expenses for which receipts may not be available.

Source reference: para. 5

The Court therefore added ₹20,000 for the father’s loss of income during treatment, transportation, attendant charges, and special diet, but made no separate award for future treatment expenses.

Source reference: paras. 5–6
05

Holding

The Court partly allowed the appeal and enhanced the total compensation from ₹20,000 to ₹40,000.

The additional ₹20,000 carries interest at 6% per annum from the date the claim application was filed until realisation; the remaining terms of the Tribunal’s award were left unchanged.

Source reference: paras. 7–8

The Registry was directed to communicate the enhanced amount to the claimant in Hindi (Devanagari), with assistance from paralegal workers if required.

Source reference: para. 9
06

Acts & Sections Cited

1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Motor Vehicles Act, 19881

Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

MINOR THANDA RAM @ ANSU YADAVvsGOPAL SAHU

Chhattisgarh High Court · September 26, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment