Madhya Pradesh High CourtAdministrative and Public LawCriminal Law

NDPS Accused Gets Passport NOC, But Must Seek Court’s Permission Before Any Foreign Trip: MP HC

Nahruv.The State Of Madhya Pradesh

NDPS Accused Gets Passport NOC, But Must Seek Court’s Permission Before Any Foreign Trip: MP HC. Nahru vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh. Madhya Pradesh High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

Whether a person facing pending criminal proceedings may receive an NOC for issuance of a passport where no immediate foreign travel is proposed.

The court held

The Court set aside the Trial Court’s order insofar as it denied the NOC and directed the Trial Court to issue an NOC to the petitioner for the limited purpose of obtaining a passport.

It also directed

Any proposed travel outside India requires a separate prior application to the Court and is subject to conditions the Court may impose.

The petition was disposed of accordingly.

01Facts

The petitioner, who was facing pending criminal proceedings under the NDPS Act, challenged the Trial Court’s refusal to grant an NOC for issuance of a passport.

¶ 1–2

The Trial Court had rejected the application, citing the absence of evidence that the petitioner needed to travel abroad in the near future and the seriousness of the pending case

¶ 1–2

The petitioner submitted that he had no present plans to travel abroad and undertook to seek the Court’s prior permission if he later wished to do so.

¶ 8

The judgment refers to the impugned order as dated 17.06.2026 in paragraph 1 and 17.06.2025 in paragraph 11.

¶ 1, 11

02Issues

i.Whether a person facing pending criminal proceedings may receive an NOC for issuance of a passport where no immediate foreign travel is proposed.

¶ 5–9

ii.Whether issuance of a passport should be distinguished from permission to travel abroad while criminal proceedings are pending.

¶ 6, 8–10

03Law Applied

Section 6(2)(f) of the Passports Act, 1967 provides for refusal of a passport where criminal proceedings are pending before a court in India, subject to the Act’s other provisions.

¶ 5

The Court relied on the Supreme Court’s interpretation in Mahesh Kumar Agarwal v. Union of India, 2025 SCC OnLine SC 2887, which considered Sections 5–10 and 22 of the Act and the Central Government notification dated 25.08.1993 (GSR 570(E)).

¶ 6

That framework permits a person facing criminal proceedings to obtain a passport notwithstanding Section 6(2)(f), subject to the criminal court’s order and the applicant’s undertaking to appear when required; it does not make prior permission to depart India for specified dates a prerequisite to passport issuance.

¶ 6

The Court also recognised that permission to travel abroad may be considered separately, on an application and subject to appropriate conditions.

¶ 9–10

Provisions in the judgment · 7 · Linked ones open on LawLens

Passports Act, 1967 Section 5Section 6Section 7Section 8Section 9Section 10Section 22

04Reasoning

Applying that framework, the Court treated passport issuance as distinct from permission to leave India.

¶ 8–9

The petitioner’s lack of an immediate travel plan did not, by itself, justify withholding an NOC for a document principally serving as proof of identity.

¶ 8–9

To protect the proceedings and ensure the petitioner’s continued presence, the Court allowed the NOC for passport issuance while requiring him to obtain prior permission from the Court before travelling abroad.

¶ 10

05Holding

The Court set aside the Trial Court’s order insofar as it denied the NOC and directed the Trial Court to issue an NOC to the petitioner for the limited purpose of obtaining a passport.

¶ 11

Any proposed travel outside India requires a separate prior application to the Court and is subject to conditions the Court may impose.

¶ 10

The petition was disposed of accordingly.

¶ 12
Madhya Pradesh High Court

Original Court PDF

NahruvsThe State Of Madhya Pradesh

Madhya Pradesh High Court · November 04, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment