Delhi High Court
Criminal Procedure and EvidenceCriminal Law

Non-compoundable Section 324 IPC proceedings may be quashed after an amicable settlement.

Ram Milan vs The State Of Nct Of Delhi & Ors.

Delhi High CourtJUDGMENT: October 13, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Non-compoundable Section 324 IPC proceedings may be quashed after an amicable settlement.. Ram Milan vs The State Of Nct Of Delhi & Ors.. Delhi High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The petitioner sought quashing of FIR No. 783/2014, registered at Police Station Narela under Section 324 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (“IPC”), and the proceedings arising from it, on the basis of a Settlement/MOU dated 7 April 2026

Source reference: p. 1

The parties appeared before the Court, were identified by the Investigating Officer, and confirmed that they had entered into the settlement voluntarily and without coercion

Source reference: p. 2

The trial court had previously been informed of the settlement; the State did not oppose the petition

Source reference: p. 2
02

Issues

Whether the High Court should exercise its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (“CrPC”) to quash a non-compoundable offence and the resulting proceedings where the parties have settled their dispute

Source reference: pp. 1–4

Whether, in light of the settlement and the private nature of the dispute, continuing the criminal proceedings would serve the ends of justice

Source reference: pp. 3–4
03

Law Applied

Section 482 CrPC preserves the High Court’s inherent power to prevent abuse of the process of any court or to secure the ends of justice.

Source reference: pp. 2–4

Under Gian Singh v. State of Punjab, (2012) 10 SCC 303, the High Court may quash proceedings for a non-compoundable offence where, having regard to the nature of the dispute and settlement, continuation would be futile and quashing would serve the ends of justice; serious offences and offences with a substantial societal impact ordinarily cannot be quashed merely on settlement

Source reference: pp. 2–4

Under Narinder Singh v. State of Punjab, (2014) 6 SCC 466, the Court should consider whether the possibility of conviction is remote and whether continuation would cause oppression, prejudice, or injustice to the accused

Source reference: p. 4
04

Reasoning

The Court treated the dispute as essentially private and noted that the parties had voluntarily settled it, the settlement had been brought to the trial court’s attention, and the State raised no objection

Source reference: pp. 2, 4

Applying Gian Singh and Narinder Singh, it concluded that continuing the proceedings would be an exercise in futility and that there was no impediment to quashing the FIR

Source reference: pp. 2–4
05

Holding

The Court allowed the request for quashing

FIR No. 783/2014, registered under Section 324 IPC, together with the proceedings emanating from it, stand quashed. The petition was disposed of accordingly

Source reference: p. 4
06

Acts & Sections Cited

2 provisions across 2 statutes referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Indian Penal Code, 18601

Code of Criminal Procedure, 19731

Delhi High Court

Original Court PDF

Ram MilanvsThe State Of Nct Of Delhi & Ors.

Delhi High Court · October 13, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment