Facts
The petitioner sought quashing of FIR No. 783/2014, registered at Police Station Narela under Section 324 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (“IPC”), and the proceedings arising from it, on the basis of a Settlement/MOU dated 7 April 2026
Source reference: p. 1The parties appeared before the Court, were identified by the Investigating Officer, and confirmed that they had entered into the settlement voluntarily and without coercion
Source reference: p. 2The trial court had previously been informed of the settlement; the State did not oppose the petition
Source reference: p. 2Issues
Whether the High Court should exercise its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (“CrPC”) to quash a non-compoundable offence and the resulting proceedings where the parties have settled their dispute
Source reference: pp. 1–4Whether, in light of the settlement and the private nature of the dispute, continuing the criminal proceedings would serve the ends of justice
Source reference: pp. 3–4Law Applied
Section 482 CrPC preserves the High Court’s inherent power to prevent abuse of the process of any court or to secure the ends of justice.
Source reference: pp. 2–4Under Gian Singh v. State of Punjab, (2012) 10 SCC 303, the High Court may quash proceedings for a non-compoundable offence where, having regard to the nature of the dispute and settlement, continuation would be futile and quashing would serve the ends of justice; serious offences and offences with a substantial societal impact ordinarily cannot be quashed merely on settlement
Source reference: pp. 2–4Under Narinder Singh v. State of Punjab, (2014) 6 SCC 466, the Court should consider whether the possibility of conviction is remote and whether continuation would cause oppression, prejudice, or injustice to the accused
Source reference: p. 4Reasoning
The Court treated the dispute as essentially private and noted that the parties had voluntarily settled it, the settlement had been brought to the trial court’s attention, and the State raised no objection
Source reference: pp. 2, 4Applying Gian Singh and Narinder Singh, it concluded that continuing the proceedings would be an exercise in futility and that there was no impediment to quashing the FIR
Source reference: pp. 2–4Holding
The Court allowed the request for quashing
FIR No. 783/2014, registered under Section 324 IPC, together with the proceedings emanating from it, stand quashed. The petition was disposed of accordingly
Source reference: p. 4Acts & Sections Cited
2 provisions across 2 statutes referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.
Indian Penal Code, 18601
Code of Criminal Procedure, 19731
Original Court PDF
Ram MilanvsThe State Of Nct Of Delhi & Ors.
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
