CAT - ['Delhi']
Administrative and Public LawEmployment and Labour Law

Notional seniority from batchmates’ joining date requires corresponding pay fixation and service benefits.

AAYUSH VATS vs COMMISSIONER OF POLICE

CAT - ['Delhi']JUDGMENT: September 10, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Notional seniority from batchmates’ joining date requires corresponding pay fixation and service benefits.. AAYUSH VATS vs COMMISSIONER OF POLICE. CAT - ['Delhi']. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicants were recruited as Head Constables (AWO/TPO) pursuant to the 2013 Delhi Police examination.

Source reference: pp. 5–7

They could not join the first training batch, which joined on 4 July 2016, and joined service later, in 2017–2018, allegedly due to administrative delay.

Source reference: pp. 5–7

The respondents subsequently placed them in the inter-se seniority list with their examination batchmates from 4 July 2016, but declined to grant notional pay fixation, increments, MACP and related benefits for the intervening period.

Source reference: pp. 5–7

After their representations were rejected, the applicants filed this OA seeking, among other reliefs, notional appointment from 4 July 2016 and consequential service benefits.

Source reference: pp. 5–7
02

Issues

1. Whether applicants granted seniority from 4 July 2016 should also receive notional pay fixation and consequential service benefits from that date, despite joining later.

Source reference: pp. 7–8

2. Whether the applicants were entitled to notional service credit for determining MACP and NPS-related benefits.

Source reference: p. 6
03

Law Applied

The application was brought under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985.

Source reference: p. 5

The Tribunal relied on the principle stated by the Delhi High Court in Director of Education & Anr. v. Smt. Krishna Kumari, W.P.(C) No. 13987/2009, decided 21 December 2009: where notional seniority is granted from an earlier date, the fiction must be given effect for pay fixation and consequential service benefits, including applicable progression benefits.

Source reference: pp. 8–9

It also followed the Tribunal’s decision in Anil Kumar v. Commissioner of Police & Anr., O.A. No. 1329/2025, decided 21 November 2025, which applied that principle to notional pay fixation, MACP and NPS benefits.

Source reference: pp. 8–10
04

Reasoning

The Tribunal found the present case materially identical to Anil Kumar, a comparison the respondents did not dispute.

Source reference: pp. 10–11

Since the applicants had been placed in the inter-se seniority list with their batchmates from 4 July 2016, the Tribunal held that the service benefits associated with that notional date should likewise be counted from 4 July 2016.

Source reference: p. 11

It therefore applied the reasoning in Anil Kumar and Krishna Kumari to the applicants’ claim for notional service benefits.

Source reference: p. 11
05

Holding

The Tribunal disposed of the OA in terms of its decision in Anil Kumar and directed the respondents to take a decision accordingly.

The order records that the applicants’ notional service benefits are to be counted from 4 July 2016; pending MAs were also disposed of, with no order as to costs.

Source reference: p. 11
06

Acts & Sections Cited

1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Administrative Tribunals Act, 19851

CAT - ['Delhi']

Original Court PDF

AAYUSH VATSvsCOMMISSIONER OF POLICE

CAT - ['Delhi'] · September 10, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment