01Facts
The wife petitioned under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, to transfer MAT Case No. 25 of 2025, pending before the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Hindol, to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kamakhya Nagar.
pp. 1–3She submitted that she was deserted and had no independent income.
pp. 1–3The husband, employed by a private company in Pune, did not oppose the transfer and requested permission to appear virtually when appropriate.
pp. 1–302Issues
i.Whether the matrimonial proceeding should be transferred from Hindol to Kamakhya Nagar under Section 24 CPC
p. 1 · p. 3ii.Whether the parties may appear by video conference, subject to the trial court’s permission and requirements for physical attendance
pp. 3–403Law Applied
Section 24 CPC empowers the High Court to transfer proceedings between competent courts.
p. 1 · p. 4The Court also referred to the High Court of Orissa and District Courts Use of Electronic Communication and Audio-Video Electronic Means Rules, 2025 as the framework for virtual appearances.
p. 1 · p. 4The judgment refers generally to the “settled position of law” but identifies no particular precedent or further test.
p. 3Provisions in the judgment · 1 · Linked ones open on LawLens
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Section 24
04Reasoning
The Court considered the wife’s stated circumstances, the pleadings and documents, and the husband’s express non-opposition. It therefore found it appropriate to allow the transfer.
pp. 2–4Given the husband’s employment in Pune, the Court permitted either party to seek virtual appearance with the concerned court’s permission, while requiring physical attendance for effective hearings—including examination and cross-examination of witnesses—when ordered.
pp. 2–405Holding
The transfer petition was allowed.
pp. 3–6The Civil Judge (Senior Division), Hindol, was directed to transmit the record to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kamakhya Nagar, preferably within seven days of production of a certified copy.
pp. 3–6The receiving court was directed to proceed in accordance with law and endeavour to conclude the case promptly.
pp. 3–6Virtual appearances may be allowed with the court’s permission under the 2025 Rules; physical attendance remains required for effective hearings when ordered.
pp. 3–6The parties were directed to ascertain the next hearing date, avoid unnecessary adjournments, and cooperate in expeditious disposal.
pp. 3–6Original Court PDF
MOHINI GURUvsGYANARANJAN GURU
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
