01Facts
The State acquired 142.72 acres in the villages of Kharia and Payga, District Mahendragarh, for developing Sectors 9 and 10.
pp. 3–5 · ¶ 3–7The Section 4 notification was issued on 23 February 2007, followed by a Section 6 notification on 20 February 2008.
pp. 3–5 · ¶ 3–7The Collector assessed compensation at ₹12,00,000 per acre; the Reference Court dismissed the landowners’ claims for enhancement.
pp. 3–5 · ¶ 3–7In appeals under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, the landowners relied principally on sale deeds P-11, P-12 and P-18 to challenge the assessment.
pp. 5–6 · ¶ 902Issues
i.1. Whether the Reference Court erred in rejecting the relied-upon sale deeds as evidence of the market value of the acquired land.
pp. 5–7 · ¶ 9, 13–15ii.2. Whether the evidence justified enhancing the market value above the Collector’s assessment of ₹12,00,000 per acre.
pp. 6–8 · ¶ 13–1603Law Applied
The appeals were brought under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, which provides for appeals from awards in land-acquisition proceedings.
p. 4 · ¶ 5 · p. 5 · ¶ 9In assessing market value, the Court considered comparable sale transactions, including their timing, area, location and nature of land.
pp. 6–7 · ¶ 14–15It treated a post-notification sale as relevant where it was close in time to the Section 4 notification and the transaction was otherwise credible, and considered whether adjustments were warranted for differences in location and area.
pp. 6–7 · ¶ 14–15Section 51A was invoked by counsel in support of the sale deeds, but the judgment did not separately expound its rule.
p. 5 · ¶ 9Provisions in the judgment · 5
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 54Section 4Section 6Section 18Section 51
04Reasoning
The Court found that P-11 and P-12 covered a combined area of 112 kanals and 16 marlas, were executed only a few months after the Section 4 notification, and recorded a rate of ₹18,00,000 per acre.
p. 7 · ¶ 14It considered the transactions credible and saw no sufficient reason to disregard them, noting that the land represented was not a small parcel.
p. 7 · ¶ 14Although P-27 concerned a residential plot and could be excluded, the Court held that P-18, a pre-notification sale of agricultural land executed approximately two months before the notification, could not be rejected merely because it abutted the highway.
p. 7 · ¶ 15Even applying a 55% deduction for the location and area differences, the resulting value supported an assessment of ₹18,00,000 per acre.
p. 7 · ¶ 1505Holding
The Court allowed the appeals, set aside the Reference Court’s awards and fixed the market value of the acquired land at ₹18,00,000 per acre.
p. 8 · ¶ 16–17The landowners were also held entitled to statutory benefits under the 1894 Act; pending applications, if any, were disposed of.
p. 8 · ¶ 16–17Original Court PDF
RajveervsState Of Haryana And Ors
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
