Patna High CourtAdministrative and Public LawEmployment and Labour Law

Patna HC Gives Bihar Government Servant 30 Days To Raise Second ACP Claim Under State Grievance Rules

Suresh Nandan Sahayv.The State of Bihar

Patna HC Gives Bihar Government Servant 30 Days To Raise Second ACP Claim Under State Grievance Rules. Suresh Nandan Sahay vs The State of Bihar. Patna High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

1. Whether the petitioner’s claim for ACP and related service or retirement benefits could be raised under the Bihar Government Servant Grievance Redressal Rules, 2019

The court held

The Court disposed of the writ petition without deciding the petitioner’s substantive entitlement to ACP or other benefits.

It also directed

It granted him liberty to file a complaint under the Bihar Government Servant Grievance Redressal Rules, 2019 within 30 days, raising all his grounds, and directed the concerned authority to pass orders within the time prescribed by those Rules.

01Facts

The petitioner sought a direction granting him second ACP benefits with effect from 1 November 2009, together with consequential arrears, revised pay and pensionary benefits, additional pay for work on a higher post, and interest

p. 2

He relied on the Full Bench decision in Kamla Nand Thakur v. State of Bihar & Ors., reported at 2025 (2) PLJR 623, concerning the inapplicability of the departmental accounts examination requirement to ACP benefits.

pp. 3–4

The State objected that the petitioner’s service-related grievance fell within the Bihar Government Servant Grievance Redressal Rules, 2019.

p. 4

02Issues

i.1. Whether the petitioner’s claim for ACP and related service or retirement benefits could be raised under the Bihar Government Servant Grievance Redressal Rules, 2019

pp. 4–5

ii.2. Whether the High Court should determine the petitioner’s entitlement to the claimed benefits in the writ petition, or instead permit him to pursue the prescribed grievance procedure

pp. 5–6

03Law Applied

Rule 2(c) of the Bihar Government Servant Grievance Redressal Rules, 2019 defines a complaint to include service and service-benefit matters, including promotion, ACP/MACP, salary, and retirement benefits; it excludes matters already under consideration by a court.

pp. 4–5

Rule 3 provides that serving or retired State Government employees may lodge service-related complaints online, with a separate application required for each subject.

p. 5

The petitioner relied on the Full Bench ruling in Kamla Nand Thakur, which held, among other things, that the departmental accounts examination requirement under Rule 157(3)(J) of the Bihar Board’s Miscellaneous Rules, 1958 does not apply to the grant of ACP benefits under the ACP Rules, 2003.

pp. 3–4

The Court did not determine the merits or application of that precedent to the petitioner’s claim.

pp. 3–4

04Reasoning

The Court considered the nature of the relief sought and the State’s objection, then found that the 2019 Rules covered the petitioner’s grievances concerning ACP and other service and retirement benefits.

pp. 4–5

Rather than decide whether the petitioner was substantively entitled to the claimed benefits or whether Kamla Nand Thakur governed his case, the Court directed him to raise all his points through the prescribed complaint process.

pp. 5–6

It left determination of the complaint to the competent authority under the Rules.

pp. 5–6

05Holding

The Court disposed of the writ petition without deciding the petitioner’s substantive entitlement to ACP or other benefits.

p. 6

It granted him liberty to file a complaint under the Bihar Government Servant Grievance Redressal Rules, 2019 within 30 days, raising all his grounds, and directed the concerned authority to pass orders within the time prescribed by those Rules.

p. 6
Patna High Court

Original Court PDF

Suresh Nandan SahayvsThe State of Bihar

Patna High Court · October 27, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment