Patna High CourtAdministrative and Public LawEmployment and Labour Law

Patna HC Gives Bihar ANM Citing Two Work-Travel Accidents 30 Days To Seek Posting Near Home, With 90-Day Decision Deadline

Gita Kumariv.The State of Bihar

Patna HC Gives Bihar ANM Citing Two Work-Travel Accidents 30 Days To Seek Posting Near Home, With 90-Day Decision Deadline. Gita Kumari vs The State of Bihar. Patna High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

1. Whether the petitioner should first approach the competent authority by representation before seeking mandamus for transfer.

The court held

The petitioner was directed to file her representation within 30 days; the Director-in-Chief (Nursing) was directed to hear her and issue a reasoned decision within 90 days of its filing.

It also directed

The Court expressly left the merits open and disposed of the writ petition with those directions.

01Facts

The petitioner, an Auxiliary Nurse Midwifery (R), sought transfer from Community Health Centre, Kalyanpur, East Champaran, to a centre in Kudhani or Mushahari, Muzaffarpur. She cited the distance from her home, injuries sustained in two travel-related accidents, and family-care responsibilities.

pp. 2–3

She relied on an application dated 16 March 2026, which had been forwarded by local officials.

pp. 2–3

The State Health Society objected that she had approached the Court without first making a representation to the authority concerned.

pp. 2–3

02Issues

i.1. Whether the petitioner should first approach the competent authority by representation before seeking mandamus for transfer.

p. 3

ii.2. Whether the petitioner was entitled to a transfer on the grounds advanced in the writ petition.

pp. 2–3

03Law Applied

The judgment cites no statute or precedent. It applies the procedural course of requiring the petitioner to place her grievances before the designated administrative authority for consideration.

p. 3

The authority must decide the representation by a reasoned and speaking order, after affording the petitioner an adequate opportunity of hearing; the decision must be made independently and in accordance with law.

p. 3

04Reasoning

In light of the State Health Society’s objection that no representation had first been made to the competent authority, the Court directed the petitioner to submit one to the Director-in-Chief (Nursing), enclosing the order and setting out all grievances raised in the writ petition.

p. 3

The Court did not assess the merits of the transfer request or determine whether the stated personal and medical circumstances justified transfer.

p. 3

05Holding

The petitioner was directed to file her representation within 30 days; the Director-in-Chief (Nursing) was directed to hear her and issue a reasoned decision within 90 days of its filing.

pp. 3–4

The Court expressly left the merits open and disposed of the writ petition with those directions.

pp. 3–4
Patna High Court

Original Court PDF

Gita KumarivsThe State of Bihar

Patna High Court · October 27, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment