Madras High Court
Constitutional LawAdministrative and Public Law

Police cannot deny a religious procession solely on apprehension of public inconvenience.

Rajesh Kannan vs The Superintendent of Police

Madras High CourtJUDGMENT: October 16, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Police cannot deny a religious procession solely on apprehension of public inconvenience.. Rajesh Kannan vs The Superintendent of Police. Madras High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The petitioner challenged the third respondent’s order dated 11 October 2026 refusing permission for a Vel Yatra proposed for 18 October 2026.

Source reference: p. 2

He had submitted representations seeking permission to conduct the procession.

Source reference: p. 2

The State submitted that the proposed route was approximately five kilometres and could cause public inconvenience and law-and-order concerns; it suggested instead a procession of approximately one kilometre, from Alanganallur Murugan Temple to Alanganallur 15B Mettupatti village.

Source reference: p. 3

The petitioner accepted that suggestion.

Source reference: p. 4
02

Issues

1. Whether the refusal of permission for the proposed religious procession was justified by the stated concerns of public inconvenience and law and order

Source reference: pp. 3–4

2. Whether the procession could be permitted on a shorter route, subject to reasonable conditions for public safety and order

Source reference: pp. 4–5
03

Law Applied

Article 25 of the Constitution protects the right to practise and profess religion, subject to public order, morality, health and the other provisions of Part III.

Source reference: p. 3

Religious processions on public roads may be subject to reasonable regulation by competent authorities for public order, traffic management and public safety.

Source reference: p. 3

Such regulatory power must be exercised on relevant grounds and not arbitrarily to deny a procession merely because of an apprehension of public inconvenience.

Source reference: p. 3
04

Reasoning

The Court considered the State’s concerns about the proposed five-kilometre route but noted that the State had suggested a shorter route and the petitioner had accepted it.

Source reference: pp. 3–4

Given the approaching procession date, the Court concluded that the procession could proceed on that route with police regulation and appropriate conditions, rather than allowing the impugned refusal to stand.

Source reference: pp. 4–5
05

Holding

The Court set aside the impugned order and disposed of the petition, permitting the procession from Alanganallur Murugan Temple to Alanganallur 15B Mettupatti village.

It directed the police to give the petitioner a reasonable opportunity to provide details of the route, timing, duration and arrangements, and to regulate the procession in accordance with law.

Source reference: p. 5

The petitioner was required to comply with the conditions imposed and conduct the procession peacefully; the exercise was to be completed before 18 October 2026.

Source reference: p. 5
Madras High Court

Original Court PDF

Rajesh KannanvsThe Superintendent of Police

Madras High Court · October 16, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment