Karnataka High Court
Criminal Procedure and EvidenceCriminal Law

Police directed to complete the investigation and file a final report within six weeks.

SRI. H SUGANAKAR RAO vs THE POLICE INSPECTOR

Karnataka High CourtJUDGMENT: October 07, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Police directed to complete the investigation and file a final report within six weeks.. SRI. H SUGANAKAR RAO vs THE POLICE INSPECTOR. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The petitioner filed PCR No. 4389/2024 against respondents 2–5, alleging offences under Sections 406, 420, 166 and 120B read with Section 34 of the IPC.

Source reference: no citation

On 19 April 2024, the Magistrate referred the complaint to the Indiranagar Police Station for investigation under Section 156(3) CrPC and directed that a report be filed

Source reference: p. 3–4

The petitioner sought transfer of the inquiry to another agency, alleging a need for an unbiased investigation

Source reference: p. 2

The State informed the Court that the investigation was in progress and that the police would file a final report within a reasonable time; the investigating officer’s communication described investigative steps already taken

Source reference: p. 4–7
02

Issues

1. Whether the investigation in PCR No. 4389/2024 (Crime No. 79/2025) should be transferred from the Indiranagar Police Station to another agency

Source reference: p. 2

2. Whether the Court should direct the respondent-police authorities to complete the investigation and submit a final report within a specified period

Source reference: p. 7–8
03

Law Applied

The petition invoked the High Court’s inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC, corresponding to Section 528 BNSS, to seek transfer of the investigation

Source reference: p. 2

The Magistrate had referred the complaint for police investigation under Section 156(3) CrPC

Source reference: p. 3–4

The order cites no precedent or detailed legal test governing transfer of an investigation; it resolves the matter on the circumstances presented, including the police’s representation that the investigation was ongoing

Source reference: p. 7–8
04

Reasoning

The Court considered the investigating officer’s communication describing investigative steps and the HCGP’s submission that a final report would be filed if reasonable time were granted

Source reference: p. 4–7

In light of those representations, the Court did not order a transfer to another agency.

Source reference: p. 7–8

It instead addressed the petitioner’s concern about delay by directing the existing police authorities to complete the investigation and submit a final report within a fixed period

Source reference: p. 7–8
05

Holding

The Court did not grant the requested transfer.

It disposed of the petition, directing the respondent-police authorities to complete the investigation and submit a final report as expeditiously as possible and, in any event, within six weeks from receipt of a copy of the order

Source reference: p. 8

The petitioner was granted liberty to pursue any other remedies available in law

Source reference: p. 8
06

Acts & Sections Cited

8 provisions across 3 statutes referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Code of Criminal Procedure, 19733

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 20231

Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

SRI. H SUGANAKAR RAOvsTHE POLICE INSPECTOR

Karnataka High Court · October 07, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment