Facts
The petitioner challenged an adjudication order dated 18 April 2024 and an appellate order dated 7 July 2026.
Source reference: para. 2He contended that the show-cause notice was uploaded only under the GST portal tab “Additional Notice and Orders,” without separate intimation, and that he consequently did not respond.
Source reference: para. 2He stated that he learned of the adjudication order only in late February 2026 and that his subsequent appeal under Section 107 of the WBGST and CGST Acts was dismissed as time-barred.
Source reference: para. 2The State maintained that the petitioner had been given adequate opportunities to defend the case
Source reference: para. 2–4Issues
Whether the appellate authority’s dismissal of the petitioner’s appeal on limitation should stand where the show-cause notice had been uploaded under the “Additional Notice and Orders” tab without separate intimation
Source reference: para. 3, 5–6Whether, in the circumstances, the adjudication and appellate orders should be set aside and the appeal reconsidered on its merits
Source reference: para. 6–7Law Applied
Section 107 of the West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act and the Central Goods and Services Tax Act provides for an appeal against an adjudication decision.
Source reference: para. 2, 5–7The Court applied the principle of natural justice that a person must receive adequate notice and a fair opportunity to respond before an adverse decision is made.
Source reference: para. 2, 5–7No precedent was cited
Source reference: para. 2, 5–7Reasoning
The Court found that the petitioner had made a prima facie case that the show-cause notice was uploaded only under the “Additional Notice and Orders” tab and that no separate intimation was given.
Source reference: para. 5–6It considered that this prevented the petitioner from replying and constituted a breach of natural justice.
Source reference: para. 5–6As the appeal had been rejected solely on limitation, without consideration of the merits, the Court held that interference was warranted in the interests of justice
Source reference: para. 5–6Holding
The Court quashed and set aside both the appellate order dated 7 July 2026 and the adjudication order dated 18 April 2024.
It directed the appellate authority to reconsider the petitioner’s appeal on its merits, provide an opportunity of hearing, and issue a fresh reasoned decision in accordance with law within 12 weeks, with communication to the petitioner within the following week.
Source reference: para. 7–8The writ petition was disposed of accordingly
Source reference: para. 7–8Acts & Sections Cited
2 provisions across 2 statutes referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.
West Bengal Goods And Services Tax Act, 20171
Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 20171
Original Court PDF
MIHIR KUMAR BISWASvsASST. COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE, STATE TAX, KRISHNANAGAR CHARGE AND ORS.
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
