Calcutta High Court
Administrative and Public LawTax Law

Portal-only upload of a show-cause notice without separate intimation violates natural justice.

MIHIR KUMAR BISWAS vs ASST. COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE, STATE TAX, KRISHNANAGAR CHARGE AND ORS.

Calcutta High CourtJUDGMENT: October 08, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Portal-only upload of a show-cause notice without separate intimation violates natural justice.. MIHIR KUMAR BISWAS vs ASST. COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE, STATE TAX, KRISHNANAGAR CHARGE AND ORS.. Calcutta High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The petitioner challenged an adjudication order dated 18 April 2024 and an appellate order dated 7 July 2026.

Source reference: para. 2

He contended that the show-cause notice was uploaded only under the GST portal tab “Additional Notice and Orders,” without separate intimation, and that he consequently did not respond.

Source reference: para. 2

He stated that he learned of the adjudication order only in late February 2026 and that his subsequent appeal under Section 107 of the WBGST and CGST Acts was dismissed as time-barred.

Source reference: para. 2

The State maintained that the petitioner had been given adequate opportunities to defend the case

Source reference: para. 2–4
02

Issues

Whether the appellate authority’s dismissal of the petitioner’s appeal on limitation should stand where the show-cause notice had been uploaded under the “Additional Notice and Orders” tab without separate intimation

Source reference: para. 3, 5–6

Whether, in the circumstances, the adjudication and appellate orders should be set aside and the appeal reconsidered on its merits

Source reference: para. 6–7
03

Law Applied

Section 107 of the West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act and the Central Goods and Services Tax Act provides for an appeal against an adjudication decision.

Source reference: para. 2, 5–7

The Court applied the principle of natural justice that a person must receive adequate notice and a fair opportunity to respond before an adverse decision is made.

Source reference: para. 2, 5–7

No precedent was cited

Source reference: para. 2, 5–7
04

Reasoning

The Court found that the petitioner had made a prima facie case that the show-cause notice was uploaded only under the “Additional Notice and Orders” tab and that no separate intimation was given.

Source reference: para. 5–6

It considered that this prevented the petitioner from replying and constituted a breach of natural justice.

Source reference: para. 5–6

As the appeal had been rejected solely on limitation, without consideration of the merits, the Court held that interference was warranted in the interests of justice

Source reference: para. 5–6
05

Holding

The Court quashed and set aside both the appellate order dated 7 July 2026 and the adjudication order dated 18 April 2024.

It directed the appellate authority to reconsider the petitioner’s appeal on its merits, provide an opportunity of hearing, and issue a fresh reasoned decision in accordance with law within 12 weeks, with communication to the petitioner within the following week.

Source reference: para. 7–8

The writ petition was disposed of accordingly

Source reference: para. 7–8
06

Acts & Sections Cited

2 provisions across 2 statutes referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

West Bengal Goods And Services Tax Act, 20171

Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 20171

Calcutta High Court

Original Court PDF

MIHIR KUMAR BISWASvsASST. COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE, STATE TAX, KRISHNANAGAR CHARGE AND ORS.

Calcutta High Court · October 08, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment