Facts
The appellant, Dashrath Kashyap, sustained injuries to his head, leg, chest, shoulder and hand in a motor accident.
Source reference: paras. 1–4He underwent treatment for approximately 35 days at several hospitals, including hospitals in Chhattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh and Andhra Pradesh.
Source reference: paras. 1–4The First Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jagdalpur, awarded him ₹1,88,750, comprising ₹1,40,000 towards medical expenses, ₹8,750 towards loss of income during treatment, and ₹40,000 towards pain and suffering, attendant charges and special diet.
Source reference: paras. 1–4The appellant filed the present appeal seeking enhancement of compensation, contending that the amounts awarded under the non-medical heads were inadequate.
Source reference: paras. 1–4The insurer opposed the appeal and submitted that the Tribunal’s award was just and proper.
Source reference: paras. 1–4Issues
1. Whether the compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal under the heads of loss of income, pain and suffering, attendant charges and special diet was inadequate and required enhancement?
Source reference: paras. 5–62. Whether the appellant was entitled to separate compensation for transportation expenses and future treatment expenses, in view of his prolonged and multi-hospital treatment?
Source reference: paras. 5–7Law Applied
The Court applied the principle that compensation in motor accident claims must be just and reasonable and should account not only for documented medical expenses but also for reasonable consequential expenses arising from the injury and treatment.
Source reference: paras. 5–6Compensation may be awarded under distinct heads, including loss of income during treatment, pain and suffering, attendant charges, special diet, transportation expenses and future treatment expenses.
Source reference: paras. 5–6The Court noted that victims may incur genuine miscellaneous and out-of-pocket expenses during hospitalization for which formal receipts are not available.
Source reference: paras. 5–6Reasoning
The Court found that the appellant’s injuries, 35-day hospitalization and treatment at multiple hospitals situated in different States justified enhancement beyond the amounts granted by the Tribunal.
Source reference: paras. 5–7Although the medical expenses of ₹1,40,000 were retained, the Court considered the award of ₹8,750 for loss of income insufficient and enhanced it to ₹35,000.
Source reference: paras. 5–7It also enhanced the combined award for pain and suffering, attendant charges and special diet from ₹40,000 to ₹80,000.
Source reference: paras. 5–7Considering the repeated hospitalization, travel between hospitals and the inconvenience necessarily incurred during treatment, the Court additionally awarded ₹40,000 towards transportation and ₹20,000 towards future treatment.
Source reference: paras. 5–7Holding
The appeal was partly allowed.
The total compensation was enhanced from ₹1,88,750 to ₹3,15,000.
Source reference: paras. 8–9After deducting the amount already awarded, the appellant was held entitled to an additional ₹1,26,250, carrying interest at 6% per annum from the date of filing of the claim application until realization.
Source reference: paras. 8–9The remaining terms of the Tribunal’s award were left undisturbed.
Source reference: paras. 8–9The Registry was directed to communicate the enhanced amount to the claimant in Hindi/Devanagari, with assistance from paralegal workers where necessary.
Source reference: para. 10Original Court PDF
DASHRATH KASHYAPvsSAMPAT KASHYAP
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
