Facts
The petitioners were appointed as Forest Guards in 2011 and confirmed in 2016.
Source reference: para. 4Under the Guard Class-III (Departmental Examination) Rules, 2009, passing a departmental exam is required for promotion to Forester.
Source reference: para. 4In 2019, the petitioners failed the exam while their juniors passed and were subsequently promoted on 06.03.2021.
Source reference: para. 4The petitioners later cleared the examination on 05.10.2021 and were promoted in 2023 and 2025.
Source reference: para. 9The petitioners approached the High Court seeking a "deemed date" of promotion (06.03.2021) to maintain seniority over their juniors, citing the statutory rules.
Source reference: para. 6Issues
1. Whether the petitioners are entitled to a deemed date of promotion and seniority over their juniors who passed the departmental examination earlier, as per the 2009 Rules.
Source reference: para. 7 / para. 10Law Applied
The court primarily applied Rule 8 of the Guard, Class-III (in the subordinate service of the Forest Department (Departmental Examination) Rules, 2009.
Source reference: para. 10This rule stipulates that a Guard who passes the departmental examination within the specified period and chances shall, upon promotion to Forester, be assigned seniority over a person who, despite being junior in the Guard cadre, was promoted earlier solely because they passed the examination sooner.
Source reference: para. 10While deemed date promotions are not ordinary, they must be granted when mandated by statutory rules framed under Article 309 of the Constitution of India.
Source reference: para. 11.1Reasoning
The court reasoned that Rule 8 of the 2009 Rules creates a specific statutory right for senior employees to reclaim their seniority position even if they pass the requisite qualifying exam later than their juniors, provided it is within the allowed chances.
Source reference: para. 11Since their juniors were promoted on 06.03.2021, the court held that the respondent authority's failure to backdate the petitioners' promotions to that same date directly ignored the binding nature of Rule 8.
Source reference: para. 12The court emphasized that the state cannot ignore its own statutory rules which allow for such deemed date seniority.
Source reference: para. 11.1Holding
The court allowed the petition in part, holding that the petitioners are entitled to receive the promotion with a deemed date of 06.03.2021.
The court directed the respondent authority to issue fresh promotion orders for the petitioners to reflect this deemed date on or before 31.05.2026.
Source reference: para. 13Rule was made absolute to that extent, and the connected civil application was disposed of.
Source reference: para. 14Original Court PDF
PARMAR MADARSINH HAJURJIvsSTATE OF GUJARAT
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in