Gujarat High Court

Promoted employees are entitled to seniority from the date of junior’s promotion upon passing requisite departmental examinations.

PARMAR MADARSINH HAJURJI vs STATE OF GUJARAT

Gujarat High CourtJUDGMENT: April 28, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The petitioners were appointed as Forest Guards in 2011 and confirmed in 2016.

Source reference: para. 4

Under the Guard Class-III (Departmental Examination) Rules, 2009, passing a departmental exam is required for promotion to Forester.

Source reference: para. 4

In 2019, the petitioners failed the exam while their juniors passed and were subsequently promoted on 06.03.2021.

Source reference: para. 4

The petitioners later cleared the examination on 05.10.2021 and were promoted in 2023 and 2025.

Source reference: para. 9

The petitioners approached the High Court seeking a "deemed date" of promotion (06.03.2021) to maintain seniority over their juniors, citing the statutory rules.

Source reference: para. 6
02

Issues

1. Whether the petitioners are entitled to a deemed date of promotion and seniority over their juniors who passed the departmental examination earlier, as per the 2009 Rules.

Source reference: para. 7 / para. 10
03

Law Applied

The court primarily applied Rule 8 of the Guard, Class-III (in the subordinate service of the Forest Department (Departmental Examination) Rules, 2009.

Source reference: para. 10

This rule stipulates that a Guard who passes the departmental examination within the specified period and chances shall, upon promotion to Forester, be assigned seniority over a person who, despite being junior in the Guard cadre, was promoted earlier solely because they passed the examination sooner.

Source reference: para. 10

While deemed date promotions are not ordinary, they must be granted when mandated by statutory rules framed under Article 309 of the Constitution of India.

Source reference: para. 11.1
04

Reasoning

The court reasoned that Rule 8 of the 2009 Rules creates a specific statutory right for senior employees to reclaim their seniority position even if they pass the requisite qualifying exam later than their juniors, provided it is within the allowed chances.

Source reference: para. 11

Since their juniors were promoted on 06.03.2021, the court held that the respondent authority's failure to backdate the petitioners' promotions to that same date directly ignored the binding nature of Rule 8.

Source reference: para. 12

The court emphasized that the state cannot ignore its own statutory rules which allow for such deemed date seniority.

Source reference: para. 11.1
05

Holding

The court allowed the petition in part, holding that the petitioners are entitled to receive the promotion with a deemed date of 06.03.2021.

The court directed the respondent authority to issue fresh promotion orders for the petitioners to reflect this deemed date on or before 31.05.2026.

Source reference: para. 13

Rule was made absolute to that extent, and the connected civil application was disposed of.

Source reference: para. 14
Gujarat High Court

Original Court PDF

PARMAR MADARSINH HAJURJIvsSTATE OF GUJARAT

Gujarat High Court · April 28, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment