Chhattisgarh High Court

Regular bail granted for abetment of suicide following charge-sheet filing and lack of criminal antecedents.

PANESAR @ PARMESHWAR vs THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: April 08, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicant filed a First Bail Application seeking release in connection with Crime No. 07/2025.

Source reference: para. 1

The prosecution alleges that between December 22 and 24, 2024, the applicant frequently quarreled with and assaulted his wife while under the influence of alcohol.

Source reference: para. 2, 3

Following these disputes, the wife fled to a forest with their 14-month-old daughter; both were subsequently discovered dead by hanging.

Source reference: para. 2

The applicant was arrested on January 6, 2025, and the police have since completed the investigation and submitted a charge-sheet.

Source reference: para. 2, 3
02

Issues

Whether the applicant is entitled to regular bail under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, for the alleged offence of abetment of suicide.

Source reference: para. 1, 5
03

Law Applied

Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, which provides the High Court with discretionary power to grant regular bail.

Source reference: para. 1

Section 108 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), which defines and penalizes the abetment of suicide.

Source reference: para. 1, 2

Standard judicial parameters for bail, including the absence of criminal antecedents, the filing of the charge-sheet, and the duration of the applicant's incarceration.

Source reference: para. 6
04

Reasoning

The court examined the competing interests of the State and the liberty of the accused.

Source reference: no citation

The State opposed bail by highlighting the gravity of the incident involving the death of a mother and child and the presence of physical injuries noted in the post-mortem report.

Source reference: para. 4

The applicant argued there was no direct evidence connecting him to the alleged commission of the offence beyond general allegations of domestic disputes.

Source reference: para. 3

The court observed that the investigation reached finality with the filing of the charge-sheet and noted the applicant’s lack of criminal history.

Source reference: para. 6

Recognizing that the trial would likely be prolonged and that the applicant had been in judicial custody since January 6, 2025, the court concluded that continued detention was not warranted provided the applicant complied with strict procedural conditions to ensure his presence during trial.

Source reference: para. 6, 7
05

Holding

The court allowed the bail application and directed the release of the applicant on a personal bond with two local sureties.

The holding is contingent upon several conditions: the applicant must not seek adjournments during witness examination, must appear on all trial dates (personally or through counsel), and must appear in person for specific stages of the trial including the framing of charges and recording of statements under Section 351 of the BNSS.

Source reference: para. 7

Default in these conditions authorizes the trial court to treat the default as an abuse of the liberty of bail and initiate proceedings under Sections 209 or 269 of the BNS.

Source reference: para. 7
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

PANESAR @ PARMESHWARvsTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · April 08, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment