CAT - ['Srinagar']
Employment and Labour LawAdministrative and Public Law

Respondents must decide pending representations by a reasoned order within six weeks.

Abdul gani sheergojri vs GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTMENT

CAT - ['Srinagar']JUDGMENT: September 24, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Respondents must decide pending representations by a reasoned order within six weeks.. Abdul gani sheergojri vs GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTMENT. CAT - ['Srinagar']. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicant, an employee of the Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh Finance Corporation who had been deputed to the Government, claimed ₹1,43,511 in Sixth Pay Commission arrears for 1 January 2006 to 30 June 2010. The Corporation’s report recorded ₹72,339 as payable by it and ₹71,172 as payable by the Government; the applicant disputed receiving a separately approved payment of ₹36,000.

Source reference: p.3, para. 5

After the applicant’s representations remained undecided, he filed this OA seeking payment, reconciliation and related reliefs.

Source reference: pp. 1–3, paras. 1–6

At the hearing, his counsel agreed that the OA could be disposed of by directing the respondents to decide the representations within a fixed time, and the respondents did not object.

Source reference: p.4, para. 7
02

Issues

Whether the respondents should be directed to decide the applicant’s pending representations concerning the claimed arrears within a specified period.

Source reference: p.4, paras. 7–8

Whether the Tribunal should determine the applicant’s entitlement to the arrears or other substantive reliefs at this stage.

Source reference: p.5, paras. 8–9
03

Law Applied

The Tribunal did not identify or apply a specific statutory provision, precedent, or substantive legal doctrine. It disposed of the OA on the applicant’s narrowed request, which was not opposed, and directed a reasoned and speaking decision on the representations, having regard to the Corporation’s communication dated 22 March 2019 and the applicant’s entitlement, subject to any impediment.

Source reference: p.4, para. 7; p.5, para. 8

The Tribunal expressly left the merits undecided.

Source reference: p.5, para. 9
04

Reasoning

The applicant agreed to seek only a time-bound decision on his representations, and the respondents did not oppose that course.

Source reference: p.4, para. 7

The Tribunal therefore did not adjudicate the disputed payment, deductions, or the applicant’s ultimate entitlement to arrears. Instead, it directed the respondents to consider the identified representations and issue a reasoned order in light of the 22 March 2019 communication, while expressly reserving the merits.

Source reference: p.5, paras. 8–9
05

Holding

The OA was disposed of at the admission stage, without a decision on the merits.

The respondents were directed to decide the representations dated 7 May 2024, 30 October 2025 and 16 February 2026 by a reasoned and speaking order within six weeks of receiving the Tribunal’s order, subject to the applicant’s entitlement and any impediment.

Source reference: p.5, para. 8

No order as to costs was made.

Source reference: p.5, para. 10
CAT - ['Srinagar']

Original Court PDF

Abdul gani sheergojrivsGENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTMENT

CAT - ['Srinagar'] · September 24, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment