01Facts
The claimants appealed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking enhancement of compensation awarded for the death of Lakhandhar Yadav, aged 54, in a road accident on 24 June 2020. The Claims Tribunal had awarded ₹11,68,470, assessing the deceased’s monthly income at ₹7,555. The claimants contended that the income should instead be assessed at the applicable minimum wage of ₹8,860 per month; the insurer opposed enhancement.
¶ 1–3The deceased’s claimed occupation as a mason and monthly income of ₹12,000 were not supported by cogent or reliable evidence.
¶ 502Issues
i.1. Whether the Tribunal’s assessment of the deceased’s monthly income at ₹7,555 should be replaced by the applicable minimum wage of ₹8,860 for calculating compensation.
¶ 2, 5ii.2. Whether applying the relevant compensation principles to the revised income entitled the claimants to enhanced compensation.
¶ 6–703Law Applied
Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, provides for an appeal against a Claims Tribunal award.
¶ 1In assessing compensation, the Court relied on National Insurance Company Ltd. v. Pranay Sethi, (2017) 16 SCC 680; Sarla Verma & Ors. v. Delhi Transport Corporation & Ors., (2009) 6 SCC 121; and Magma General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Nanu Ram @ Chuhru Ram & Ors., (2018) 18 SCC 130, applying principles concerning future prospects, deduction for personal expenses, the multiplier, and conventional heads of compensation.
¶ 6Where the claimed income is not proved by reliable evidence, the Court may assess income by reference to the applicable minimum-wage notification.
¶ 5Provisions in the judgment · 1 · Linked ones open on LawLens
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173
04Reasoning
The Court found no reliable proof of the deceased’s asserted income of ₹12,000 per month, but held that the Tribunal’s assessment of ₹7,555 was below the applicable minimum wage for unskilled labour.
¶ 5It therefore used ₹8,860 monthly income, added 10% for future prospects, deducted one-fourth for personal expenses, and applied a multiplier of 11. Adding ₹2,09,000 under conventional heads produced total compensation of ₹11,73,854.
¶ 5–605Holding
The appeal was partly allowed, and the award was enhanced from ₹11,68,470 to ₹11,73,854.
¶ 7–8The claimants were awarded an additional ₹5,384, carrying interest at 6% per annum from the date of filing the claim application until realization; the remaining terms of the Tribunal’s award were left unchanged.
¶ 7–8The Registry was directed to communicate the enhanced amount to the claimants in Hindi, with paralegal assistance if required.
¶ 9Original Court PDF
SMT. KRISHNA BAI YADAVvsBALKRISHNA YADAV
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
