Chhattisgarh High CourtTransport, Maritime, and Aviation LawAdministrative and Public Law

Bus Operator’s Manendragarh Route Permit Application Must Be Decided Within 30 Days, Chhattisgarh HC Directs

SHANTANU RAIv.REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY

Bus Operator’s Manendragarh Route Permit Application Must Be Decided Within 30 Days, Chhattisgarh HC Directs. SHANTANU RAI vs REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY. Chhattisgarh High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

Whether the Regional Transport Authority should be directed to decide the petitioner’s pending application for a permanent stage carriage permit

The court held

The Court disposed of the petition and directed the Regional Transport Authority, Chhattisgarh, to consider and decide the petitioner’s application dated 01.09.2026 by a reasoned and speaking order, in accordance with law, within 30 days of receiving a certified copy of the order.

It also directed

The Court expressed no opinion on the merits of the application; all issues were left open, and no costs were ordered.

01Facts

The petitioner applied on 01.09.2026 for a permanent stage carriage permit to operate on the Pendraroad–Manendragarh route.

¶ 1

He alleged that the application remained undecided despite reminders and beyond the period prescribed by Rule 74(4) of the Motor Vehicle Rules, 1994.

¶ 1–4

The State submitted that the competent authority would decide the application in accordance with law within a reasonable time.

¶ 1–4

The application’s pendency was admitted.

¶ 5

02Issues

i.Whether the Regional Transport Authority should be directed to decide the petitioner’s pending application for a permanent stage carriage permit

¶ 1, 5–7

ii.Whether the application should be decided within a time-bound period, having regard to Rule 74(4) of the Motor Vehicle Rules, 1994

¶ 2, 5–7

03Law Applied

Rule 74(4) of the Motor Vehicle Rules, 1994, as noted by the Court, contemplates that an application for a permit be considered and decided within 60 days.

¶ 2, 5

The competent authority must decide the application in accordance with law; the Court may direct a time-bound decision where an application remains pending.

04Reasoning

The application had been pending since 01.09.2026, and no decision had been taken despite the 60-day period contemplated by Rule 74(4).

¶ 5

In light of that admitted position and the State counsel’s submission that the application would be decided, the Court considered a time-bound direction appropriate to meet the ends of justice.

¶ 4–6

It left the merits of the permit application to the competent authority.

¶ 8

05Holding

The Court disposed of the petition and directed the Regional Transport Authority, Chhattisgarh, to consider and decide the petitioner’s application dated 01.09.2026 by a reasoned and speaking order, in accordance with law, within 30 days of receiving a certified copy of the order.

¶ 7

The Court expressed no opinion on the merits of the application; all issues were left open, and no costs were ordered.

¶ 8
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

SHANTANU RAIvsREGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY

Chhattisgarh High Court · November 04, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment