Chhattisgarh High CourtCriminal Procedure and EvidenceCriminal Law

Chhattisgarh HC Allows Company To Withdraw FIR Plea Against Alleged Landowner Impostors, With Liberty To Pursue BNSS Remedies

E.B.P.L. VENTURES COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITEDv.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh HC Allows Company To Withdraw FIR Plea Against Alleged Landowner Impostors, With Liberty To Pursue BNSS Remedies. E.B.P.L. VENTURES COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH. Chhattisgarh High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

Whether the petitioner should be permitted to withdraw the petition and pursue remedies under Sections 175 and 223 of the BNSS.

The court held

The Court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn, with liberty to the petitioner to pursue remedies under Sections 175 and 223 of the BNSS.

It also directed

It issued no direction to register an FIR and made no determination on the merits of the petitioner’s allegations.

01Facts

The petitioner sought a writ directing the Station House Officer, Police Station Civil Lines, Raipur, to register an FIR against Respondents 4–25 on the basis of complaints dated 20 July 2026 and 11 August 2026.

¶ 1

The petitioner also sought directions for proceedings concerning the alleged failure of the police to act on those complaints.

¶ 1

After arguments, the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to pursue remedies under Sections 175 and 223 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS).

¶ 2

02Issues

i.Whether the petitioner should be permitted to withdraw the petition and pursue remedies under Sections 175 and 223 of the BNSS.

¶ 2

ii.Whether the Court should determine the petitioner’s entitlement to a direction for registration of an FIR on the merits.

¶ 1

03Law Applied

The Court referred to Sections 175 and 223 of the BNSS as the remedies the petitioner proposed to pursue after withdrawal.

¶ 2

The order does not interpret those provisions, apply any other statutory provision or precedent, or determine a substantive rule concerning registration of an FIR.

Provisions in the judgment · 2 · Linked ones open on LawLens

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 175Section 223

04Reasoning

The petitioner requested withdrawal after arguments and sought liberty to take recourse under Sections 175 and 223 of the BNSS.

¶ 2

The Court allowed that request without examining whether the complaints warranted registration of an FIR or deciding the petitioner’s other claims.

¶ 2–4

Its order therefore leaves the merits open for any proceedings pursued through the stated statutory remedies.

¶ 2–4

05Holding

The Court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn, with liberty to the petitioner to pursue remedies under Sections 175 and 223 of the BNSS.

¶ 3–4

It issued no direction to register an FIR and made no determination on the merits of the petitioner’s allegations.

Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

E.B.P.L. VENTURES COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITEDvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · November 04, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment