Section 170-B of the CG Land Revenue Code is inapplicable to land transactions executed prior to October 2, 1959.

The petitioners’ predecessor, Budhu Ram Mahkul, purchased land (Khasra No. 390/2) from Raghunath (predecessor of respondents 1-6) via a registered sale deed dated 25.11.1953

The land was mutated in Budhu Ram’s name in 1953 itself, as evidenced by the Khate Ka Ghoshwara and Adhikar Abhilekh of 1954-55

In 2014-15, the respondents filed an application under Section 170-B of the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code, 1959, alleging illegal possession

The Sub Divisional Officer (SDO) ordered reversion of the land to the tribal holders on 19.06.2017, erroneously finding that mutation occurred in 1962 (after the Code's commencement) and that the transaction was not notified

This order was upheld by the Collector and the Commissioner

1. Whether the provisions of Section 170-B of the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code, 1959, apply to land transactions executed prior to the commencement of the Code on 02.10.1959.

2. Whether the revenue authorities erred in fact by concluding that the subject transaction was governed by Section 170-B based on the date of mutation rather than the date of the sale deed.

Section 170-B of the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code, 1959, which mandates notification of land acquisitions from aboriginal tribes made between 02.10.1959 and 24.10.1980

Division Bench precedent in Yadram (Dead) v. State of Chhattisgarh (WP No. 1066/2002), which settled that Section 170-B has no application to transactions entered into before 02.10.1959

Principles from the Transfer of Property Act, noting that title passes on the date of execution of a registered sale deed, and mutation is merely a subsequent administrative act

The Court found that the SDO’s finding—that mutation occurred in 1962—was factually incorrect and pertained to a different land parcel (Khasra No. 390/1)

Documentary evidence (Adhikar Abhilekh 1954-55) proved the subject land (Khasra No. 390/2) was mutated in the purchaser's name well before 1959

Legally, the Court reasoned that even if mutation occurred after 1959, Section 170-B would not be attracted because the transaction (the sale deed) was executed in 1953

The court clarified that mutation is not an independent transaction; title is transferred upon the registration of the sale deed under the Transfer of Property Act

Since the transaction occurred in 1953, it fell outside the statutory window of 1959–1980 defined under Section 170-B

The High Court allowed the petition and set aside the orders of the SDO (19.06.2017), the Collector (29.01.2018), and the Commissioner (17.08.2021)