Chhattisgarh High CourtAdministrative and Public LawCivil Procedure and Evidence

Teacher Who Declined Promotion At Counselling Must Be Considered For Lecturer Vacancy Left Unfilled, Chhattisgarh HC Orders

RAMESHWAR DEWANGANv.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Teacher Who Declined Promotion At Counselling Must Be Considered For Lecturer Vacancy Left Unfilled, Chhattisgarh HC Orders. RAMESHWAR DEWANGAN vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH. Chhattisgarh High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

Whether the petitioner’s case should be considered for posting as Lecturer against a vacancy remaining unfilled after counselling, despite his having declined promotion during counselling.

The court held

The petition was disposed of with a direction to the respondent authorities to consider the petitioner for promotion posting against a vacancy remaining unfilled after counselling, in accordance with Clause H, and to issue an appropriate posting order within 30 days from production of the order before the Director of Public Instructions.

It also directed

The petitioner was permitted to submit a copy of the order to the Director for compliance.

01Facts

The petitioner, a Teacher (L.B.), was promoted to Lecturer (Physics) by order dated 22.07.2025, with counselling scheduled for 26.09.2025.

¶ 2–3

He sought consideration for a Lecturer (Physics) vacancy at Government Higher Secondary School, Kansinghi, but received no decision on his representation before counselling.

¶ 2–3

He declined the promotion during counselling, but later expressed willingness to accept any vacancy remaining unfilled after counselling.

¶ 2–3

The State submitted that his claim could be considered under Clause H of the counselling guidelines dated 08.09.2025.

¶ 2–3

02Issues

i.Whether the petitioner’s case should be considered for posting as Lecturer against a vacancy remaining unfilled after counselling, despite his having declined promotion during counselling.

¶ 2–3

ii.Whether the authorities should issue a posting order under Clause H of the counselling guidelines within a specified period.

¶ 5

03Law Applied

The Court applied Clause H of the counselling guidelines dated 08.09.2025 as the governing basis for considering posting against vacancies remaining unfilled after counselling.

¶ 5

The judgment identifies no statute or precedent as a basis for its decision.

¶ 5

04Reasoning

The Court confined its consideration to the petitioner’s limited request for posting against a vacancy left unfilled after counselling.

¶ 3–5

In light of the State’s submission that his claim would be considered under Clause H, the Court directed the authorities to consider the claim and issue an appropriate posting order; it did not direct posting at the specific school sought by the petitioner.

¶ 3–5

05Holding

The petition was disposed of with a direction to the respondent authorities to consider the petitioner for promotion posting against a vacancy remaining unfilled after counselling, in accordance with Clause H, and to issue an appropriate posting order within 30 days from production of the order before the Director of Public Instructions.

¶ 5–7

The petitioner was permitted to submit a copy of the order to the Director for compliance.

¶ 5–7
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

RAMESHWAR DEWANGANvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · October 28, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment