Facts
The petitioner sought a direction permitting the conduct of the annual festival’s initial puja (Mudhal Poojai) at Arulmigu Periya Muthaalamman Temple in accordance with previous practice.
Source reference: p. 1; para. 1He contended that the idols of five villages were placed at the Sadaiyandi Kovil Thinnai in Devarappanpatti, where there was insufficient space for a joint puja.
Source reference: p. 1; para. 1Ganesan was impleaded, asserting that his family had traditionally made the festival idols and that the orders would affect him.
Source reference: p. 2; para. 2The respondents stated that the idols were required to be made at Devarappanpatti under an agreement, while Ganesan’s counsel maintained that they had been made there and were then located in that village.
Source reference: p. 2; para. 3The Court noted that the customary-practices document entrusted the idol-making task to Ganesan’s ancestors, and that the idol made by Mani had not been placed at the Sadaiyandi Kovil Thinnai.
Source reference: p. 3; para. 4Issues
Whether the petitioner was entitled to a direction permitting the Mudhal Poojai to be conducted in the manner and at the place sought, having regard to the customary arrangements for the festival.
Source reference: pp. 1–3; paras. 1, 3–5Whether directions were required concerning placement of the festival idol and maintenance of law and order.
Source reference: p. 3; para. 5Law Applied
The petition was brought under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, which empowers the High Court to issue writs and directions.
Source reference: p. 1The Court also considered the customary practices recorded in a document concerning the festival and the associated arrangement for making the idols.
Source reference: p. 3; para. 4No specific statutory provision, precedent, or further legal test was cited in the order.
Source reference: no citationReasoning
The Court considered the competing accounts about where the idols were made, but treated the recorded customary practice—under which Ganesan’s ancestors were entrusted with making the idols—as material to resolving the immediate festival arrangements.
Source reference: pp. 2–3; paras. 3–4In light of that practice and the fact that the relevant idol had not been placed at the Sadaiyandi Kovil Thinnai, the Court directed that the idol made by Ganesan be placed there before being taken to the temple.
Source reference: p. 3; para. 5It did not separately order that the Mudhal Poojai be conducted at a different location.
Source reference: p. 3; para. 5Holding
The writ petition was disposed of with directions that Ganesan’s idol for Arulmigu Periya Muthaalamman Temple be placed at the Sadaiyandi Kovil Thinnai and thereafter taken to the temple, and that the respondents coordinate with the jurisdictional police to take necessary measures to maintain law and order during the annual festival.
No order as to costs was made.
Source reference: p. 3; para. 5Original Court PDF
SasikumarvsThe Commissioner
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
