Karnataka High Court
Civil LawInsurance Law

Unproved deceased income must be assessed using the applicable Lok Adalat notional-income guidelines.

MANAGER vs SMT RAKSHITHA P G

Karnataka High CourtJUDGMENT: September 25, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Unproved deceased income must be assessed using the applicable Lok Adalat notional-income guidelines.. MANAGER vs SMT RAKSHITHA P G. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

On 17 October 2022, Sagar S. died after a bus collided with the car he was driving.

Source reference: p. 5

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal found the bus driver negligent and awarded the claimants ₹73,00,000 with interest at 6% per annum.

Source reference: p. 5; p. 8

The insurer appealed, challenging the income assessed and the award for loss of love and affection; the claimants cross-objected, seeking enhancement.

Source reference: pp. 5–6
02

Issues

Whether the deceased’s income, for calculating loss of dependency, was properly assessed by the Tribunal or should be based on notional income.

Source reference: pp. 5–6

Whether the compensation under loss of consortium and loss of love and affection, and the total award, required modification.

Source reference: pp. 6–8
03

Law Applied

The Court considered the appeal under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

Source reference: pp. 1–2

For assessing compensation, it applied the 2022 Lok Adalat guidelines to determine notional monthly income where satisfactory proof of the deceased’s income was absent.

Source reference: p. 6

It calculated loss of dependency by adding 40% for future prospects, applying a multiplier of 16 for the deceased’s age, and deducting one-third for personal expenses because there were three dependants.

Source reference: p. 7

It further held that consortium was payable to each dependant, while loss of love and affection was not a separate head of compensation; funeral expenses and loss of estate were maintained at the amounts awarded by the Tribunal.

Source reference: pp. 7–8
04

Reasoning

The income-tax returns relied on by the claimants were in the mother’s name, and the Court found no satisfactory proof of the deceased’s income. It therefore substituted notional income of ₹15,500 per month under the 2022 Lok Adalat guidelines.

Source reference: p. 6

Applying the future-prospects addition, multiplier and personal-expenses deduction, it assessed loss of dependency at ₹27,77,600.

Source reference: p. 7

It replaced the Tribunal’s awards of ₹44,000 for consortium and ₹55,000 for loss of love and affection with ₹1,32,000 for consortium to three dependants, and excluded loss of love and affection as a separate head.

Source reference: p. 7

It retained ₹16,500 each for funeral expenses and loss of estate, resulting in total compensation of ₹29,42,600.

Source reference: pp. 7–8
05

Holding

The Court modified the Tribunal’s award, reducing compensation from ₹73,00,000 to ₹29,42,600, with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the petition until realisation.

It directed the insurer to deposit the compensation and accrued interest within eight weeks of receiving a certified copy of the judgment; the amount is to be disbursed in accordance with the Tribunal’s award.

Source reference: pp. 9–10

Both the insurer’s appeal and the claimants’ cross-objection were disposed of, with no order as to costs.

Source reference: p. 9; p. 10
06

Acts & Sections Cited

1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Motor Vehicles Act, 19881

Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

MANAGERvsSMT RAKSHITHA P G

Karnataka High Court · September 25, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment