01Facts
The petitioners obtained a maintenance order from the Family Court, Dhanbad, on 24 May 2022, directing the respondent to pay monthly maintenance to petitioner no. 1 and their two children. The respondent’s criminal revision against that order was dismissed by the Jharkhand High Court on 28 June 2024.
p. 2The petitioners later sought to enforce the order before the Family Court at Rohini, where they and the respondent were residing. The Rohini court directed them to produce a certificate of non-pendency of execution proceedings from the Dhanbad court; the petitioners challenged that direction under Article 227 of the Constitution and Section 528 of the BNSS.
pp. 2–302Issues
i.1. Whether the Family Court at Rohini could enforce the maintenance order made by the Family Court at Dhanbad, given that the parties were residing within its jurisdiction.
p. 4ii.2. Whether the Family Court at Rohini was justified in requiring the petitioners to produce a transfer certificate from the Dhanbad court before proceeding with enforcement.
pp. 3–403Law Applied
Section 147 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 provides that an order for maintenance, interim maintenance, or expenses of proceedings may be enforced by any Magistrate in any place where the person against whom the order was made may be, provided the Magistrate is satisfied as to the parties’ identities and the non-payment due.
p. 4The provision does not require a transfer certificate from the court that made the maintenance order.
p. 5Provisions in the judgment · 3 · Linked ones open on LawLens
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 528Section 147
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Section 125
04Reasoning
The Court found that both the petitioners and the respondent resided in Delhi, within the jurisdiction of the Family Court at Rohini, and therefore that court could enforce the Dhanbad maintenance order under Section 147 BNSS.
p. 4Since Section 147 contains no requirement to obtain a transfer certificate from the originating court, the Rohini court’s insistence on one was unjustified.
pp. 4–505Holding
The Court allowed the petition and directed the Family Court at Rohini to proceed with enforcement of the maintenance order without requiring a transfer certificate.
p. 5It also set aside the costs imposed for failure to produce that certificate and clarified that it had expressed no opinion on the merits of the case.
p. 5Original Court PDF
Chanda Kumari & Ors.vsDilip Kumar Singh
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
