01Facts
On 16 December 2023, Shamshad Hajaratali Jhare fell while alighting from a NWKRTC bus at Bailhongal bus stand after the driver moved the bus; she died during treatment on 21 December 2023.
pp. 3–5Her husband and six children sought compensation, asserting that she earned income through milk vending and shepherding work and supported the family.
pp. 3–5The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs. 23,15,589, including Rs. 18,40,800 for loss of dependency, and interest at 6% per annum.
p. 6The claimants appealed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking enhancement.
p. 2, 602Issues
i.1. Whether the compensation awarded by the Tribunal was inadequate and required modification
p. 8ii.2. What order should follow from the Court’s determination of the compensation issue
p. 803Law Applied
Under Sarla Verma v. Delhi Transport Corporation, the applicable multiplier is determined by the deceased’s age.
p. 10Under National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Pranay Sethi, future prospects are added to the deceased’s income and an appropriate deduction is made for personal expenses.
pp. 10–12The Court relied on Shishupal @ Shish Ram v. Surjeet for assessing the contribution of a homemaker: the decision provides for a composite amount for loss of domestic care where the relevant heads apply, and states that domestic-care loss may be additional where the homemaker also participates in the workforce.
pp. 10–12The appeal was brought under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
p. 2Provisions in the judgment · 1 · Linked ones open on LawLens
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173
04Reasoning
The Court accepted the post-mortem report as the reliable evidence of age, found the deceased to be 48 years old, and applied multiplier 13.
pp. 9–10It considered that she cared for her family and also undertook income-generating work, and, applying Shishupal, assessed her monthly income at Rs. 30,000.
pp. 10–12It added 25% for future prospects and deducted one-fifth for personal expenses, resulting in loss of dependency of Rs. 46,80,000 (Rs. 30,000 × 1.25 × 4/5 × 12 × 13).
p. 12The Court left undisturbed the Tribunal’s awards for consortium, loss of estate, funeral expenses and medical expenses.
p. 1305Holding
The Court partly allowed the appeal and enhanced the total compensation to Rs. 51,54,789 from Rs. 23,15,589.
pp. 13–14The enhanced compensation carries interest at 6% per annum from the date of the petition until payment, excluding the 220-day delay in filing the appeal.
p. 14The Corporation was directed to deposit the enhanced amount with accrued interest before the Tribunal within eight weeks of receiving the certified copy of the judgment.
p. 14Original Court PDF
SRI HAJARATALI HANIFSAB JALAGAR ALIAS JHAREvsTHE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
